Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 04 April 2017 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349801294D4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvUjD92qbrK0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x244.google.com (mail-it0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930FB1294C2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x244.google.com with SMTP id w11so12165501itb.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f54KhsWcqVJapP8NCumO1JIaeYDtOs8ZTdH3B7hN21A=; b=IRAciO7jTAau4NVw/WdZZcZ+JBJ2DEf21dfn5QbvwYR2Uy/6utC9FgPnNF9JKQ/4cV uA2iyl0j9ZYLIqvOyEO32yQTZVazdAx5CEmmbDp9eKrKQ5XFjnAn2dcIv8Q5x4cJRj1I wMj1uGrNYp+6zGUD7w3BkrSLIaPm8uJrZdKqq782O0Us2ss48BhM9Ct+7y1OUu+sOahD Y/NdUsgc5DilKyhg5bHLqLBTlUehX2gUVDlr5sNBtQabKKlwJMN8Cr/aIyp7RCVdNqVY dAddbmeI9/2HTOFILchYOGWHBEU0Hm2gK3ggggYdoRFANyHEcaqlwxyDcLWRqNqp7AZk hclQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f54KhsWcqVJapP8NCumO1JIaeYDtOs8ZTdH3B7hN21A=; b=Qv/wIpN94E8vjIS9UTJiOBPizPKtCtUKwH9sEut1gQbtKNTBfE4ZnHIGczUtgCL1uM yr569StaAyfBCjDJsO2hHeZXldptkPPVO5zA88NHm3F6A1zwOYyp486PYC/icXxJh1XI GKgSpat9p0nhvw1sV8Vg9Aqp+3/P6TrasHIXXKvSI2R9YrUIo9M52TpeZchW664L9ff0 9InuSfhHHaRxtkQqhppu4n2HfYfpKuwJDm94JpQ9DSkhK6jqexUC/l4NkECRIQr3cdHa GmRMvTFuAmZLDr1j4xqb5J/ICexxyefUrKARrGKh1e/guPoqq8+EUHEY2MPM+K3dTJMg oU8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1b7EP8Eb2/E1dBIB72Blpq0rseYx3G397lCLv4+2XPIVQgo2gm CbwdF6jNTGukE+Qf
X-Received: by 10.36.80.213 with SMTP id m204mr16935243itb.105.1491335913837; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k16sm7688393itk.2.2017.04.04.12.58.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <CA+b+ERk8kHWyBY3GPp21-pgrL_SsShaLkrn4UdecFeQPYamSEg@mail.gmail.com> <A0F19A98-7DBE-4616-B949-529ED2A81D62@ericsson.com> <CA+b+ERk_cKGB6a0SQd560cMiOzT4KbSic6fCCwQWrhNkNEcO3Q@mail.gmail.com> <76ABEAE0-6A89-4C69-82ED-968F949A3B19@employees.org> <CA+b+ERmqpRuw0z4ZQkhNYfEqGvqEJKYwM0hkuWg8dZrYXT4DdQ@mail.gmail.com> <FCFFDDCF-7A53-41E2-B414-53E568C92B35@employees.org> <CA+b+ERmELF1p_5vX_nqhB58Bm8c34N6=kkijuCRYkfkQcfKneQ@mail.gmail.com> <0ae6ba21-0529-e9ca-ab74-b18a85acad4a@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm7vO-ZpSHKLvY+BfgWpMa7+abKR6BFnXkgUuUPEXYVEg@mail.gmail.com> <931f29e0-a029-2098-38c9-bc65e43ca0ab@si6networks.com> <CA+b+ERk2E43abOjYQSLQNpYu7OUunZhMzrHdaNxndWEujPa9Qw@mail.gmail.com> <ec10ed2a-a187-4539-d62e-67d331881887@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnowxo2ynO9QomXMOEwnQjVJB703NsNUzW9qACOco8CVg@mail.gmail.com> <49627D61-E761-4739-A349-C9639F0D6350@ericsson.com> <CA+b+ERkEg=6vt_MQrzCrRxOBQCOnVW3d58+MyhCnMWDuF2Ra1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <ab0eb5a5-350c-3e2b-03a6-0d5cfc4f5e72@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:58:32 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkEg=6vt_MQrzCrRxOBQCOnVW3d58+MyhCnMWDuF2Ra1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Zq_WhqGa9wLU1VUVmkxrUaVrAy4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:58:36 -0000

On 05/04/2017 02:26, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> Yes. It is legal. Please take a look at section 7 of RFC2473.
>>
> 
> 
> Well this section says only if ​you reassemble during decapsulation.
> 
> That is going to be interesting at 100 GE port speeds especially if someone
> would like to use anycast SIDs to exit the SR domain via cluster of exit
> ASBRs.

That's why I mentioned jumbo frames. Obviously, you want to engineer your
SR domain such that fragmentation is never needed. Agreed, encapsulation
adds an extra 40 bytes in that calculation.

   Brian