Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21.txt> (Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks) to Informational RFC

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 12 November 2019 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFFE120046 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6I-NSQIqMppe for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FB212024E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id l17so2274558wmh.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to:message-id; bh=y62MxQ926gs0rx5re/Z2q6YNPQM28bAo4aHYpbaD4oI=; b=QFKEyEmjxx873uUzFD4hDq0sWAC5Iyd/sO9Kk98mIkMB1YM1s5FYlo6Mf0IKR4DjMc MxAvEOXESUxsaP2bwzBR/7ncCVRPM7xYuTSobKG+KVZ5zVrd9BrPYpxr+Pe/fmYiU4sV a+nRbxk6Q/bOE/DXi7RMU86P7ExNMjLQHphMbXQBtg2ceRaKgk9oeIRkZs913u/6Ik2M 5qlJQsI9VShCiCt2T9E5iD+tzMgXpBP5csartAvvBPYhBVu2m4WblJmDMIgNJgvIW5SM UGctvwp5Q6Mp0LtZLYpM3c8cWxd/5r4jReepDJo0Qy+WTVIybr/0iTuy38rGvHBWyCu5 pmkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; bh=y62MxQ926gs0rx5re/Z2q6YNPQM28bAo4aHYpbaD4oI=; b=Yx78hEgdyMEBZvu9EOwVCGJ86hod3yQm9ctmroXJ3TyHMX8RoMH7yjVQU7tLeSNxZB xEoAOW0SF80S1pyTpyLh4YHG8pxXeo4MntNIiYb3klBlBgTdY+Fv5qZ16MOJjoZfBanZ JoZL2CST2AT9JJHiZguBsB5VWV81cdkpglfoDmsTDiRc7S2yCPVkLtlrQyYDTY6L/yoL QilTTA2mLp8dr804wPX18uy4PuT3rITzqn14aO/urbi4P0wyZ44acXBLv2TJ3uhjo/QB EGanmowq5xqhlWhLRiBDVeL4q/5GcF8phCIXjRJhOajVurQL2nZJnswUsQU90DazLr44 J+Fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3z7ab3MgU8G7EGKVRPgHdK7l5NvaKfQTUHu1Ljz3OsfEdTNK4 J/TM5bE7HUF6XDgnDDWgSEM7MKwCCdY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGLaTZxsysOWTSbBn1jnvDO5cKuME/6vBuCFdIfkhDIeHUmSvXruzVzI+4ztlUYQ0qYBfDNA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:814b:: with SMTP id c72mr3079664wmd.167.1573550615668; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.31.6.117] (221x241x135x82.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [221.241.135.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d198sm3921108wmd.2.2019.11.12.01.23.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:23:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_62BF422B-46F5-404D-92F0-0CB0E7CA3EC8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21.txt> (Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks) to Informational RFC
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:23:30 +0900
References: <157348692828.7549.5693363954495959926.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?Q?Ole_Tr=C3=B8an?= <otroan@employees.org>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <6B51065F-7C69-43BB-A056-DB687571152D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_BNnmJ3jduy10a_h4yVbadIjqcc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:23:40 -0000

The 6man chairs think it would be good if folks in the w.g. would review this.  Please post comments to the <last-call@ietf.org list.

Thanks,
Bob & Ole


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21.txt> (Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks) to Informational RFC
> Date: November 12, 2019 at 12:42:08 AM GMT+9
> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>;
> Cc: opsec-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>;
> Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Operational Security Capabilities
> for IP Network Infrastructure WG (opsec) to consider the following document:
> - 'Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks'
>  <draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21.txt> as Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2019-12-02. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>   Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
>   available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
>   network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
>   4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network
>   managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
>   enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.
> 
>   This document analyzes the operational security issues in several
>   places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential
>   users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations techniques.
>   Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of Things
>   are not discussed in this document.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce