IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00.txt)

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 27 October 2013 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93CD11E8156 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaZQaZN6sSqW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D10C11E810C for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1718; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382908858; x=1384118458; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=W7jCgHalqDzDlkgPr8rbHpqWcSjAXKKt0sj94vSbjrs=; b=YlOBsrZsUb3pwNVRiH3U2yTo9exTnytbGqeL685frkiWvw8UrcFeSM1d uEc6eutFCWFkTwIFDaTyJRCcq4hBPU4Xf3wD2LuYeDu3uvOmIjoA0LF5i F7pSChEhNEI4yeslJGGDxunGUKw2Yzpr+yE0bKUo34qp4UjtNp/UV5MZ6 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAIGDbVKtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4VL5egRwWdIIlAQEBAwF3AgULAgEIGAoZCzIlAgQOBQgGh3MGuAyOHIEIMQeDH4ENA5AtgTCHXJBYgWiBPoFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,581,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="277353097"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2013 21:20:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9RLKvt7019522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:20:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.23]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:20:57 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00.txt)
Thread-Topic: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHO0yKkkOnsvbpp00GRW3tGlxVjfJoJYmSA
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:20:56 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7DCB5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7A268@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <526A204D.8080209@gont.com.ar> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7BABF@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAPv4CP9SajtHt+JLfdFRo-mV20fSyjtNOtT-+hs5jd9BuQC09A@mail.gmail.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7BC27@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <526D1E53.5090608@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <526D1E53.5090608@gont.com.ar>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.200.22]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DC90F6C6-840F-43CC-ADBA-4F1A0FA5297B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "<draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:21:03 -0000

On Oct 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
 wrote:

> Signed PGP part
> Hi, Fred,
> 
> On 10/26/2013 10:07 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> >
> >> It seems reasonable to me to document a recommendation, for the
> >> future, even if it will take 15 years for the not-best-practice
> >> to fade.  Therefore it seems reasonable to me to put in a
> >> SHOULD, along with all of the reasons discussed here why the
> >> installed base doesn't have to at this time.
> >
> > Which is the argument for saying "should 4861 or
> > stable-privacy-addresses".
> 
> Not sure I follow: stable-privacy-addresses is expected to be used
> along RFC4862..

Sorry, yes. Off-by-one error.

> Am I missing something?
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------
8 issues in virtual infrastructure
http://dcrocker.net/#fallacies

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status