Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 12 February 2017 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5A2129B68 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:34:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egM1wSqMlXMs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A3812944F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC8149; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:34:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:from:from :subject:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-type:received :received; s=mail; t=1486935270; bh=2oCdisKdO5AVQlgp4UwUYnbPIr9E 2G1k5wwarQkBaWg=; b=fMNCNULjwUI4dmNofqxlSeuX55OdtfZcHC7aSmDd3mws Jl8tZ8po6k+tlhGmlznYC/bEj2kGA3cS0z3b+0jFApnTy7OI4/5OhdshhjxyAA2c oenKuxfqi5uSp4oJXxuNbRm4QrZCIHlrJ5YH2qHkslqgAcceVr7pjuPQA6gtzMU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id x5NZJbrkpCDL; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:34:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:9300:286e:9ac:cd00:50d3] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:9300:286e:9ac:cd00:50d3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2B3248; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:34:29 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AACDCE3D-8895-4D4A-9909-2979DC9C082A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <2c970446-545b-edc7-178d-5526f2712eda@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:34:29 +0100
Message-Id: <833231A3-EA80-4A4E-9F22-EDF3C16B2A8B@steffann.nl>
References: <C9FDAEB9-9F79-4186-9C48-5F44E5E07235@gmail.com> <2c970446-545b-edc7-178d-5526f2712eda@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/__u9xRjzCLaPyYV0UHlVMr5D-ms>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:34:37 -0000

Hi Fernando & WG,

> Me, I have always tried, to the extent that is possible, to give enough
> credit when it's deserved, because I understand that the product of my
> work heavily relies on the work, help, and support of other people.

Just to be clear: while I'm surprised about your acknowledgements, I don't oppose them. If they are important to you as one of the the authors then they deserve to be mentioned. Who am I to judge who deserves to be acknowledged by you?

Cheers,
Sander