IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Dominik Elsbroek <dominik.elsbroek@gmail.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dominik.elsbroek@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D374521F874F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VA8QqIyJiVY7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B921F8653 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25so312083yhk.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fNEExI2OlQxH6WKSTsNCycdgruAqq35ixdaRyBNxY1c=; b=AvJHwMQiloXDRjZuvkw6avCYTPPOQQfQQE+SFpBpgz9x3okc9PpyKulWCb9m4Kn4Hw v/dzpJgBwGFyhawq4Ls6epLnBSmPaZU6+IgOwXbedhkABQpFXdL5bCvh6jlQehvtOaWq l0a+ggU3mpv+lFQ/pd7ygBwFtFjQoyGrXU0uaTQv7/JYbqZCjjTlCqm/xwBSkjDz8z/U pMCV9lDROThbiTjJiLraKZKI9Jyb/6L+53aVTWFJfGYpi5CFHriQgbxiMlRYL+/p1RZx H+kKN6eeYOko/ptJ1HcCqfbdCYq9Egh6pCf/mL8KUVvKhYDgqHIUoyqfdCsKucseppJn nvJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.158.227 with SMTP id wx3mr305588igb.31.1332879741900; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.33.74 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D3135BD4-886F-4A32-9EBB-6B537C2A4FB9@steffann.nl>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <D3135BD4-886F-4A32-9EBB-6B537C2A4FB9@steffann.nl>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:22:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAVMDnU-OucgN7+9__5u_hUK0Ca-nbdXdc3yPdHJXGNWEOF9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Dominik Elsbroek <dominik.elsbroek@gmail.com>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:22:23 -0000

> B. If an application wants to use the public address it will bind to it. Applications that don't explicitly choose don't seem to care, and then privacy addresses as default seems the best solution.
>

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email