Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC

Erik Kline <> Tue, 15 June 2021 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196303A16BF; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jy8JlfW7Bccj; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989B83A16BC; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id z14-20020a4a984e0000b029024a8c622149so2597665ooi.10; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GZ3G81Hk3W2+HQL8SVSmQhylZNz47VSwP8/lJ/PAQ3A=; b=RIEt0JtT3zeE1ngelhuDAhXr/M5ui2sMdi1TSeHOY8HQFSfq2KuoiGYBq3iJF2Wjks xJGFmS6uQXj/TDDtB3/icst7qUf/hMvk4xDlZfMVAJTqcrO7Y1JvEk66b5i6axqyBRio 8EJsXrUvgUMIxYNXRtASQq3m0IE2/ZnCu9JejvkX07JeAHJR8H8KI9qBK4mJSAU+oO41 ellkQgRict4RU5Y9RXHV42rhadadZA+7LTO+D1yKYZ9A9MzNiJp0DpOP3wtqPHY9PE84 P2zkH9lXMje/6mETajiqoqt7J33XtiARJtYfPbPr35tJXisJTSNbstfIywfFLlSjG5oh C8Mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GZ3G81Hk3W2+HQL8SVSmQhylZNz47VSwP8/lJ/PAQ3A=; b=H2UTHuIzlPbRdw7ivp8KKxsWWbXfJ32j+Zedkkm9uKP4pVGMZDJIV/YM0yFKZcRAO0 IU+1BwZ8YIL2CxFK6W4Yc4cPmtGs9hkWTaal4QsmC7lwUkyd9o9jW2gOPEJkYpzYs/O7 RIzUlSGOK1u8q0CY4CkfXxby0U5x77oC+5hBRKCNF6eKgG0yQ3XN1vzg8etg5iwY7mRA lKCFXky5FJVpJZctcpNijyct04hGjITWmkxPQwYZ4kbLt0+TFpOKQ7rgyOaC+GkfHhEh ie3GXjCC6R20Sijb8U2O/deV5u74c5GRcSwc5hsug1kfariYxDibO3EOPuI8ch/iXJf0 cM1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533r57UOHfQGxEYQSabCAvGY5S3KcmWtqJsQdJjapoFHXUnQ+yrH eCNd3bU2sl74mR1gy0Zx7hDdKbCCWkWvTfuj1jKOL/1wvhw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjkL/AQMoWsHZ1QxZSU6w7tFDBr/sDSllqjAD7TSuwItMCMwklblzuPhfm9duBBU75CkXIqS94laTcuMV4yQg=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c287:: with SMTP id b7mr15186464ooq.8.1623719249854; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Erik Kline <>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:07:19 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
Cc: IETF-Announce <>, Carlos Bernardos <>,,,, 6MAN <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 01:07:35 -0000

+6man, since there are many statements about IPv6 work in this document.

One thing of note: in the time after this document was WGLC'd, 6man
held an adoption call on OMNI that did not result in adoption [OMNI].
There are at two places where this text appears:

   "The existing IPv6 protocol must be augmented through the addition of
   an OMNI interface..."

These statements should probably be revised (or removed).



On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM The IESG <> wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the IP Wireless Access in Vehicular
> Environments WG (ipwave) to consider the following document: - 'IPv6 Wireless
> Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem
>    Statement and Use Cases'
>   <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> as Informational RFC
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> mailing lists by 2021-06-28. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> Abstract
>    This document discusses the problem statement and use cases of
>    IPv6-based vehicular networking for Intelligent Transportation
>    Systems (ITS).  The main scenarios of vehicular communications are
>    vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and
>    vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications.  First, this document
>    explains use cases using V2V, V2I, and V2X networking.  Next, for
>    IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current
>    IPv6 protocols (e.g., IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility Management,
>    and Security & Privacy), and then enumerates requirements for the
>    extensions of those IPv6 protocols for IPv6-based vehicular
>    networking.
> The file can be obtained via
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.