Re: 64share v2

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6893A0E92 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:44:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23ShWlc2YTgk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9A73A0EB4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id x20so11291356ilj.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:44:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MrP6gdeeuqgtGQ4AYgRU/9ruUSz0tixH+b8gHfmNCbQ=; b=mgHAPqTfIY3+PjBEyv36+BOh5Ob5+oPrNritUBSF2phiGAYyjtwILg3v0Z6qenX03e SOnKkdNx+n0u+ODzPyNfKHwv4XC/Acl9uzj6VAmJm6p+TRob+9SEuvwpseT2KgWcm2fL binowr8PJbqpTqPXSzbvs/9RVz4+kYu9Gtv5MC5sKcx/TxJoh8HfuOQIdUwzLQpfU6fY /4REQZo7OgOLZFEH0HRmH7+veoqxVsH30SF6G24oA6sXWjCGiQUvuk8SWGC+XSFHP5DT advOZpIjXbbyXX30e/lgNr6uj3Cu0MpSwWLVlF16Zk37/rR+7dhc1B0O5N/on2D37yBQ sMjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MrP6gdeeuqgtGQ4AYgRU/9ruUSz0tixH+b8gHfmNCbQ=; b=PuU4MG370Ht0MvPJYgHEonHuxd3we79/7566uMpwa4fzIKq+Am3UKA6cuWC91xHjbJ EanJwaNKiLnc886z5KWZt6BUAFddiNbDR8FoYLVXQcHNolGuwbNVfpkXtNxUpkhUo3uZ sFY8F/jUr51n6/GGtvWlT7IMKbcxyQcT6/W80xML9blB5TjOChBtyDDPr2xDybTtX1yL cYm0rAUi41mE7HoKR5gpndCcMpDNBYeejEqaiX8urLgmoExsngZ+3CFbz1csvfb/7On3 4zQ7FxjTXTxJek2IV/EOADubr7mX5zeJCYMsiwCbFDKme3ZdbPhwtS/rG7lRBT3w6mLJ 3Kbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XzmDVSw/UVVrgKd5zlISrItLCbqyiOhJmYtW8hGM8kYXdHkPO 6Anf3OzewFtHbVj3K1ex1FH5EvtjT4OTAezIIkCdkQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr8jBHa6YvC1EDnZysUchiQo4ZOijkENRPj5f5ZsgzEsul9aU46OlTicAeO12J0trU+7VNoE3eryiNWWhmc7Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:f43:: with SMTP id y3mr12435360ilj.187.1605001470063; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:44:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD6AjGR-NE_sJ_jp7nAT6OvNkcdE9qoWuGEiiVW7r9YtsQvbbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGR-NE_sJ_jp7nAT6OvNkcdE9qoWuGEiiVW7r9YtsQvbbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:44:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0G8PjzE+pULte_AaOi=RHMLyto-YUQerGjQ=iOYnz+iA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 64share v2
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: Ipv <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d34ef05b3bd8693"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/aInRRf9dxuBsZicCaIyLQ7tBugk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:44:41 -0000

This looks pretty similar to the PIO-X bit which +Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>
 and +Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote up in 2017:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit

I can't remember what happened to that. IIRC one of the primary
difficulties was that the scheme needs a strong guarantee from the link
layer that the RA is received by only one host. The minutes from IETF 98
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-98-6man/00/> suggest that
there was also a concern that it duplicates existing functionality in
DHCPv6 PD. Also there was a question about the router being able to
authenticate the client.

Maybe time to revive this?

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:10 PM Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> In an effort to progress the conversation, i created a simple and rough
> pre-00 i-d (as ietf is not accepting submissions now) for your review and
> comment
>
> https://pastebin.com/duyYRkzG
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>