Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C01129BEE; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:23:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fw3zO6OLsBbg; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:23:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B190129BE7; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:23:01 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,328,1477983600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="174636846"
Received: from vmwexchts04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.32]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2017 02:15:12 -0800
Received: from VMWEXCCAS01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.11) by VMWEXCHTS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:22:44 -0800
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:22:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=hs5BSrAlhJ1Fh6YOCA8j/L9Dn+ivCDgf8ng05DgAa3o=; b=ayl9F46HfjiemYc4LOozdUbGRhIBIXu0rk1s5uYmfSKtIPR3REdLeCoUxSr4T3DlsRIAf6qBM/9pE5JLrQoDhXD+5ianOPdaQOZr65pSsHrm/IyVgM1tz70fUjtAT3gvbHEqEOjXh3VaTez/OHUDT/uk+MbkWAunv7mV0a+gzLw=
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.18) by BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.12; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:43 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) by BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0874.025; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:43 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt> (Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6) to Internet Standard
Thread-Index: AQHSfOZWQnyqff8qTkSuzK39n1gXQaFVdhOAgAGB6ACAABzbgIAAAEOA
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:22:42 +0000
Message-ID: <1C5B54BD-1D6D-46F6-81A7-89ADF9A72792@netapp.com>
References: <148599312602.18643.4886733052828400859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1859B1D9-9E42-4D65-98A8-7A326EDDE560@netapp.com> <014D8A7C-449E-4849-9F49-990FF8B39DEF@employees.org> <88A7C2AD-8D33-4AFF-8AF4-A1B8718C47BD@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <88A7C2AD-8D33-4AFF-8AF4-A1B8718C47BD@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [217.70.211.15]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 630f737f-5cee-4cb5-684a-08d44c1e96e4
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1153;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0601MB1153; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0601MB1153208D9FD844B36C3D2DFCA74F0@BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1153; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1153;
x-forefront-prvs: 02070414A1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(377424004)(199003)(24454002)(189002)(83716003)(53936002)(6512007)(92566002)(3660700001)(6506006)(229853002)(99286003)(2351001)(4326007)(6246003)(3846002)(106116001)(105586002)(6306002)(106356001)(82746002)(2501003)(66066001)(122556002)(54906002)(53546003)(86362001)(102836003)(6116002)(230783001)(33656002)(57306001)(5660300001)(110136003)(99936001)(38730400001)(2900100001)(2906002)(93886004)(68736007)(8676002)(6916009)(2950100002)(5640700003)(81156014)(81166006)(1730700003)(6436002)(50986999)(76176999)(25786008)(4001150100001)(8936002)(305945005)(7736002)(77096006)(101416001)(6486002)(97736004)(36756003)(50226002)(3280700002)(189998001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1153; H:BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0F11CB5B-7BFC-405D-9EC7-C492084588F2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Feb 2017 10:22:42.7551 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0601MB1153
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/aVPQCuhRDtp6LwxXktjgx7oy8l4>
Cc: "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:23:08 -0000

On 2017-2-3, at 11:21, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
> PDF here: https://www.caida.org/~mjl/pubs/measuring-pmtud.pdf
> 
> "This paper measures PMTUD behaviour for
> 50,000 popular websites and finds the failure rate in IPv4
> is much less than previous studies. We measure the overall
> failure rate between 5% and 18%, depending on the MTU of
> the constraining link."
> 
> 5-18% is pretty bad. I would expect that the widespread deployment of CGNs since this was published in 2010 to not have improved things.

And yeah, this is for v4. I'm not aware of v6 measurements in this space.

Lars