Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 27 March 2012 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF9F21F87EF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQaUWwIgnzmA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD93521F88C2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banana.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:1e4b:d6ff:fe20:6cfe]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E662840054 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4F717DD3.7030907@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:44:03 +0200
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:44:06 -0000

Brian Haberman wrote, on 03/27/2012 09:33 AM:
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
> 
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses

I prefer B.

I don't buy the "HTTP cookies already give us away" argument. Privacy at all
levels of the stack is good. (I randomize my L2 MAC at boot time, lots of fun!)
If we have good privacy at L3, then we "only" have L7 left to fix.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca