IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why /64

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> Mon, 28 October 2013 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jeroen@massar.ch>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887C111E8248 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CB+Y2cAzXB+x for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from icaras.de.unfix.org (icaras.de.unfix.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:74c1:5054:ff:fec4:f7d4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE37911E816F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kami.ch.unfix.org (kami.ch.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:1620:f42:99:7256:81ff:fea5:2925]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by icaras.de.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2359D801C2A2; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:11:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <526E2A56.7070503@massar.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:11:50 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Organization: Massar
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: Why /64
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <526AA24F.6010609@gmail.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr0_anudWNpWRkvMGvD_pvyEscnuqEsPUy4YNm3e9Hue9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP9k_J2GCOFhTCBz3U-nQmCWSjc4nceexaWwYZ-nDMpJmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SG1PC_kA-pO5Or8VyeaOzvLfpmQe0LiiYkXU_HzNqGzCQ@mail.gmail.com> <526E250E.5050607@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1evbMf1pD4yBrZyvF2XLXGOre3bHDB0gOZTLme7vnh2A@mail.gmail.com> <526E267E.2070705@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1K+4H+Gq9dWK-tVJu_3_pw+q7Q1owGz69eg6jy--XN5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1K+4H+Gq9dWK-tVJu_3_pw+q7Q1owGz69eg6jy--XN5A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:11:56 -0000

On 2013-10-28 09:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch
> <mailto:jeroen@massar.ch>> wrote:
> 
>     >     I am NOT arguing that a /64 should go the way of the dodo.
>     >     I am only stating that this "IPv6 Privacy Address" thing is a
>     myth.
>     >
>     >
>     > Can you do so on another thread, please? This thread is about /64.
> 
>     You do realize that YOU made that point right?
> 
> 
> Yes, and I withdrew it. I withdraw it again. Please let's not talk about
> it on this thread any more.

Can you please provide a link to the message in the archives where you
did? As I clearly did not see it.

Greets,
 Jeroen

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status