RE: Liaison from BBF

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946D23A67FA for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:03:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fN2p20inFe1 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871AB3A677E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAMg8+EqtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbADGNZdFhD4EgWg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,711,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="67184462"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2009 00:03:32 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com [72.163.62.200]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA03WxL017307; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:03:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-114.cisco.com ([72.163.62.156]) by xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:03:32 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:03:29 -0600
Message-ID: <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C1C28DE@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4DEDE9C240@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Liaison from BBF
Thread-Index: AcphW6XlYiZ9jMeZSzSiHHvX2u8UrgAAbw7wAAywrdAAAfbV4A==
References: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4DEDE9BC10@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se><200911091500.nA9F0PSm002116@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com><alpine.DEB.1.10.0911091623150.22728@uplift.swm.pp.se><B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE16EDA143@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com><alpine.DEB.1.10.0911091739460.22728@uplift.swm.pp.se><B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE16EDA1DD@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4DEDE9C240@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>, "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2009 00:03:32.0152 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D66D380:01CA6199]
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:03:07 -0000

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
David Allan I
>Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:00 AM
>To: Manfredi, Albert E; Mikael Abrahamsson
>Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF

>HI

>There are a couple of scenarios to consider..

>1) Simple bridging from the home, hence a number of NIC address will
appear at the edge router...

We have so shot down this model in v6ops during the March 2009 IETF -
please see v6ops archives around this date.  If a home router bridges
all traffic from the home then let's say, Apple TV video in the home
will actually to the SP!  Or as Wes said during that time, "I am doing
my private tax returns and the data went to the SP"!

>2) Retail model for RGs, which is how I bought mine... My modem came
from my DSL provider, but as it had no wireless, so I turned off all
higher layer functions and front ended it with a Belkin box >bought over
the counter... 

Yes, this is a very common scenario that we are addressing in the IETF
v6ops IPv6 CE home router. 

Hemant