Re: [v6ops] RFC7084

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 12 December 2013 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5F81AE077 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:03:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czh7QZq-MKNR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D13F1AE075 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27212024A; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 01:16:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 4E55063B89; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:03:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B4D63848; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:03:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7084
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B13A7@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DC7BB@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0269@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCD72@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se> <F92E1B55-C74B-400C-B83E-6B50D175D121@steffann.nl> <52A74C8D.3050302@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0E9F@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DD4D4@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B13A7@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:03:03 -0500
Message-ID: <5133.1386824583@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:03:21 -0000

My reading of this discussion is that while we have a good (although
evolving) specification for the CPE devices in broadband situations,
we do not have a good specification for what the ISP is supposed to do.

The Broadband forum TR-187 (and TR-124) says a lot
  <http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-187_Issue-2.pdf>

(pages 19 onwards)

but it doesn't really say that much about how one picks SLAAC vs
DHCPv6/IA_NA, so nothing about M=1/O=1.

This discussion has been very useful to me, at least to clue me in that there
is something I should pay attention to, as I'm building ISP side product
right now.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting for hire =-