[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 02 January 2019 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D525E1274D0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:51:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUSRzvqdNpoh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D47D126C01 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:51:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9450CB80833; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:51:36 -0800 (PST)
To: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, suresh@kaloom.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, bob.hinden@gmail.com, otroan@employees.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589)
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190102215136.9450CB80833@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 13:51:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bahzLe67DQuAKBTJ4TRrnFg0sTQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:51:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5453, "Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5589 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Section: 3 Original Text ------------- +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ | Interface Identifier Range | Description | +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ | 0000:0000:0000:0000 | Subnet-Router Anycast | | | [RFC4291] | | | | | FDFF:FFFF:FFFF:FF80-FDFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF | Reserved Subnet Anycast | | | Addresses[RFC2526] | +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ Table 1: Current Assignments Corrected Text -------------- +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ | Interface Identifier Range | Description | +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ | 0000:0000:0000:0000 | Subnet-Router Anycast | | | [RFC4291] | | | | | FDFF:FFFF:FFFF:FF80-FDFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF | Reserved Subnet Anycast | | FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FF80-FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF | Addresses[RFC2526] | +-----------------------------------------+-------------------------+ Table 1: Current Assignments Notes ----- Both these ranges are in fact reserved by Section 2 of RFC2526. Under current recommendations [RFC7217] the FDFF range is no longer recommended for routine use, and the FFFF range is equally likely to occur in a pseudo-random 64-bit IID. Credit to Kerry Lynn for pointing this out. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5453 (draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-03) -------------------------------------- Title : Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers Publication Date : February 2009 Author(s) : S. Krishnan Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IPv6 Maintenance Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589) Fernando Gont
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589) Fernando Gont
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5453 (5589) Suresh Krishnan