IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: CRH and RH0

otroan@employees.org Tue, 12 May 2020 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943823A0C02 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5PqAG2gXrHVs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747FD3A0BED for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 14:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [IPv6:2a02:20c8:5921:100:88d2:d15d:16bd:2d7b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4509F4E11B45; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:47:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE4F33DF0CA; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:47:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: CRH and RH0
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB63483621F4AD3DEACA6FAF35AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 23:47:27 +0200
Cc: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F11579E-0F8A-48EB-86EC-945E17C11BF4@employees.org>
References: <4EDFE9A2-A69C-4434-BB0A-960C2453250F@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348FE6E3A45320C2A47EB66AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8068EBE1-38DD-411E-A896-EB79084BBCC4@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348326B0F72A009DB4F7746AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <942AF8C7-079E-4C81-95AB-F07A182E8F19@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB63483621F4AD3DEACA6FAF35AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bobYBwBkbyM67GQ3KveBebXoog8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 21:47:38 -0000

Hi Ron,

> The CRH is a general purpose Routing header that operates inside of a network domain. In the sense that it is a general purpose routing header, it replaces RH0. In the sense that it is restricted to a network domain, it does not replace RH0.
> 
> If adding these two sentences will cause you to support the draft, or at least not object to it, I will happily add them!
> 
> Are these the only objections?

I wasn't intending to object or to support.
I wanted to explore the claim that this could be a RH0 replacement.

I don't think you have substantiated how it possibly could be that.
It might be a digression from what you are trying to do here, so I'm fine with leaving it at that.

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email