Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CAC12954C; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:55:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ar_AR0sDIXF0; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55B51292F4; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 04:55:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3547; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510577751; x=1511787351; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=j1Tn0l1hFSYDAGb8a1hS78aC7y0QDKgHgzkSO+UsgBg=; b=BtkIDR8HctcBz8z6D4apeLijXxy203nHoTJS09c6oyNO2vKJd5rkTuuW 0m0VqJVMA5Qrftqs2qT/+nrmTtIJ2300N+9jJ87Er4Z58jYcL5my9zY0o ro+05oboEW/KB73t2So/dsURJgIaWhDkfU5w5XX2zpXCPHzLFjGV6xM9+ 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CxAAC+lQla/5tdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM1ZG4ng36KH48pgX2RCIVIgTIDXAoYAQqFGAIahD4/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohR8BAQEDAQEhSwsQAgEIBBQnAwICAiULFBECBA4FiT5kEKtlgieLBgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgzSCB4NngwGILDGCMgWKLZd9ApUCk0KVdwIRGQGBOAEfOE+BI3oVSS0BgjaEX3eIYQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,389,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="309552277"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2017 12:55:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vADCtobb030487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:55:50 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:55:49 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:55:49 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
CC: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
Thread-Index: AQHTV0P9T2sJAG849Uu+HS5e9rBDPKMRm9v1gABoPYCAAAQrAIAABQoAgAABs4CAAGicAIAAH36A//+31Ns=
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:55:49 +0000
Message-ID: <D96CCF2B-BDB3-409C-AC4D-2EF23D92021A@cisco.com>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <207f040a-7fe2-9434-e7a5-f546b26fdf63@strayalpha.com> <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com> <8ca59610-2d25-2be4-9d2c-9b1a75fd3ace@si6networks.com> <E67105A3-396B-403C-B741-E9E01CFB5CE7@employees.org> <e7ec4633-8d45-1cff-ce37-48dafd488e13@si6networks.com> <BBAB48C0-384B-4380-9359-7965C7C61D58@employees.org> <4b7e8e53-ea7a-f84d-92cf-a9a113c200ce@si6networks.com>, <CAKD1Yr1NG93Jv7E6hKY4BKApwJg6uG0wAgUL74cw1Fb5VsKnUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1NG93Jv7E6hKY4BKApwJg6uG0wAgUL74cw1Fb5VsKnUg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D96CCF2BBDB3409CAC4D2EF23D92021Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bqrs2vRNxBOU02GNGqY3OBz7yDw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:55:54 -0000

Thanks to you as one of the authors.

- Bernie (from iPhone)

On Nov 13, 2017, at 7:14 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com<mailto:fgont@si6networks.com>> wrote:
>From a operational point of view, one would wonder why pursue this path
as opposed to e.g. do DHCPv6

As for DHCPv6 specifically, one reason is that DHCPv6-only networks are not recommended by the IETF. RFC 7934.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------