IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPv6]Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-a ddr-assign-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 25 March 2025 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E31124ADDC for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ix0nLTOWA5pb for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAAE124ADB1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.131.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 52PKlcZr020433 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1742935689; x=1743022089; i=@elandsys.com; bh=97tzKCygFRGIUqQYoXUMjbpWZK+07kK63oFMsD+PF7A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=x+NTce0gpZH2TTqt+0Rlt0LkduCmU691pdnsELVuiBL+IsFEkI8+7/0/wmVMWMxqe PuU4tYRgK8sX9KRPRkr0snwGyx5PPB5+lv/tTkAPXvo2v2gzQVp7GWKH2+rxtHSc+A uQ33hZKx5rhuGo+KMXtQvqRkxhoL8l3xC0Yvr/i0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20250325133848.0e38d550@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:47:02 -0700
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ipv6@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <MR1PPF6395AA9E6C8F1087C08AFC8D0858388A72@MR1PPF6395AA9E6.F RAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <174283031314.1620549.3112467496693348745@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z> <bcef76a4-2fc9-41e8-a41b-7f80ec41955b@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau016tEnvk75GyHab1OtLSdm1W69c5Vry_0ci5DswyPjOg@mail.gmail.com> <MR1PPF6395AA9E6C8F1087C08AFC8D0858388A72@MR1PPF6395AA9E6.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: ZVW3PB5ZPABBMNIJDSJRMU5GARPF4O7P
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZVW3PB5ZPABBMNIJDSJRMU5GARPF4O7P
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: Mohamed Boucadair's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-a ddr-assign-02: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bs4PtoezIdZoTsvTCusKhM_6wbA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Med,

>I think I hear the IESG saying they don't have a properly formed 
>question to decide on.
>
>So, I think we, the authors, should request the change in Section 4. 
>Then, we can ask for a new IANA review, particularly if IANA 
>believes there are any problems with retitling the two registries. 
>Then, the IESG can make an informed decision on whether to retitle 
>the two Registries. If they decide no, then we will remove it again.

I dropped attribution as I am not sure who wrote the above.

There was a registry which was renamed in or around 2014.

The working group chairs or authors could reach out to "IANA".  The 
Area Director/IESG can then take a decision based on the feedback.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status