Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86095129421 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:14:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xmh9SekqmS7s for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471EC12944A for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 72so9777700itl.5 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:14:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o0ViJReLWVl3ndBkIXA/LI/PdxoHbn/ZqZ5mWvhYVJg=; b=CTsnhzlZ0iT6LVKghEFoAbxHjp8zLFrLpGWlXBRIXOXL8Gkp7cBdBKgMhJiR3awXwP IoBuFtXaCWPUL6rRKuHymsUCe9eNx6UDDfjA6e0hRvjSL2EXQGNV4gAjGJlOFB9T6K1a QgxiG2rYuDRHc5epG//cSAf3atHvnym1QfJMAy2ym1SzDcdDSg/66tM6pnnD9eI4Zeb/ qRcDsGie29/ONaqVh5OcMzF9rK2EJj9S6zLj1lQ1+9XLSEWB5tAz4pLhovvsvPAlvArX WVePkCOShkwPu/86UTdPKNWYBtZZnrfmGf/XIvfIhA56iDI1WpEqFgIcCrmqzWSnAVou ZmoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o0ViJReLWVl3ndBkIXA/LI/PdxoHbn/ZqZ5mWvhYVJg=; b=RrxPt0xvN/h6PLLn7GrQZTqVMKe0UR9gx8f2fPcYG0AbcDdInV4Utyuv/35fybqFdX hXQr4paSIb5uwPkYxZfq7QaqYN2CbnJko7lq/gCCimJoBiO2if1uYhC3tgspMuJ7I7e7 +EpX7jZ1V3GnOZtNMcQEEMVdMYLoc7gGYv0gN317GQWBVkETuT5KPBnuzFn3Wat1y/v/ ei1k1+oocm+9r+26huUa5Fwasn5uzTxqJ+XT72ITvKk0Ssc2KykvCCQGP5OetRg+9Q5R acOG/6E8KP3Fr95oPwMlnHe1gVuWpp+x9hxVum02w5y2ZACOmz1PjJeUmKhMl8uwLqQ1 mbnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6X9sNuxYyPctJL/hKdXTCAa/LGON1p3ikFH2JIHc3PFkthMQbW kDA8mdukVdt1xPUXfqEwl7B8T0mUM61jh28J7oJK6yQD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbM5zApVNu1C8ejVikakVOVchNGVGtmv2vbKB6jH+EPHVoXWMAkt3pyFaG4O6aonSgusmlhGv1x9UAd/UdVCY8=
X-Received: by 10.36.88.72 with SMTP id f69mr10333706itb.129.1510586054158; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:14:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.82.19 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:13:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5A0999A4.3040807@foobar.org>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <207f040a-7fe2-9434-e7a5-f546b26fdf63@strayalpha.com> <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com> <8ca59610-2d25-2be4-9d2c-9b1a75fd3ace@si6networks.com> <E67105A3-396B-403C-B741-E9E01CFB5CE7@employees.org> <e7ec4633-8d45-1cff-ce37-48dafd488e13@si6networks.com> <BBAB48C0-384B-4380-9359-7965C7C61D58@employees.org> <4b7e8e53-ea7a-f84d-92cf-a9a113c200ce@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr1NG93Jv7E6hKY4BKApwJg6uG0wAgUL74cw1Fb5VsKnUg@mail.gmail.com> <5A0999A4.3040807@foobar.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:13:53 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr30vQTXkApnWQHWJutQ_bwHyno1w42K3dNoqrJebzR5Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144d01e29d959055ddeb9f5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bxkXPyvXjuTvaCBZxVM3vlAS8Zo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:14:17 -0000

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>; wrote:

> >     >From a operational point of view, one would wonder why pursue this
> path
> >     as opposed to e.g. do DHCPv6
> >
> > As for DHCPv6 specifically, one reason is that DHCPv6-only networks are
> > not recommended by the IETF. RFC 7934.
>
> reminder: there is no WG consensus that this is what RFC 7934 means.
>

Actually, IIRC the thread you started a couple of months ago reaffirmed
that consensus. (The document does not state that DHCPv6 address assignment
is not recommended, it only states that networks that *only* use DHCPv6
address assignment are not recommended.)