Re: Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC 6890
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 January 2014 19:45 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099CC1A0450 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phhSgj6BY4OO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFAE1A044E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kx10so3530763pab.35 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wmP0xkC9SXjn1BkTNtwAvjWkAva9sgaQ8PCMybDCaWk=; b=FVNOmINEe5QTBEMtL9yneq/sWRESDzlLd8auqpwUhEKljTVA6Geugk2/qmp2msjOeR elLUJDk7F5YLrH8fsg6zp5ml1JoL3kZ6MbgAcPXes0I+6dRZb6IdCh9kpMtpMR2ocg8J Om7/qRCLGTg5mr2XeaoPMHbbF43NC5Eso8X85PteSRei8e8JxNqMRQPH9SawFsxjFl2i yTEmI1um+2KhImdVtxrlf9+sQ3J/WZRr8zI0HUHtEIrMfsz0kNrrNc/G+k9Ds+M99lh+ YYWmw8kLHlqsmKFbRjV07rSYDr+5R3ebwKJXg7emvKDfuje1gVl3g9bPSeA3SrJG5Z5T kT5A==
X-Received: by 10.66.154.169 with SMTP id vp9mr16061389pab.39.1391111136523; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (9.200.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.200.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mo2sm20158918pbc.6.2014.01.30.11.45.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52EAABE5.3060009@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:45:41 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC 6890
References: <20140130222122.3484.8FE1F57E@jpix.ad.jp> <52EA5FDC.3090309@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <52EA5FDC.3090309@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:45:41 -0000
On 31/01/2014 03:21, Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2014-01-30 08:21, MAWATARI Masataka a écrit : >> The following table on the RFC 6890 says that global of 2001::/32 >> is false. > > Looks to me like an errata in RFC 6890... Agreed. The entry for 2002::/16 is better and that approach would work for 2001::/32, I think: N/A, see [RFC4380]. Both of these prefixes are routed as if they are global but they are special, so neither True nor False is correct. There is the same bug for fc00::/7, which is explicitly of global scope but special: N/A see [RFC4193]. Brian
- Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC 6890 MAWATARI Masataka
- Re: Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC… Simon Perreault
- Re: Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about TEREDO prefix described in RFC… MAWATARI Masataka