Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6788 (7077)

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Chris,

I'm fine with marked the erratum as "technical". -- Is there anything 
else needed from my side?

Thanks,
Fernando




On 9/8/22 17:20, Chris Smiley wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
> Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
> report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the
> Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
> 
> You may review the report at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7077
> 
> Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further
> information on how to verify errata reports.
> 
> Further information on errata can be found at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/cs
> 
> 
>> On Aug 9, 2022, at 12:34 AM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6788,
>> "The Line-Identification Option".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7077
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Section: 6.2
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> The link-layer destination address of the outer IPv6 datagram containing the outer IPv6 datagram MUST be resolved using regular Neighbor Discovery procedures.
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> The link-layer destination address of the outer IPv6 datagram MUST be resolved using regular Neighbor Discovery procedures.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The corrected text removes the text duplication with is technically incorrect. The text may also be fixed as:
>>
>> The link-layer destination address of the outer IPv6 datagram containing the tunneled Router Advertisement MUST be resolved using regular Neighbor Discovery procedures.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6788 (draft-ietf-6man-lineid-08)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : The Line-Identification Option
>> Publication Date    : November 2012
>> Author(s)           : S. Krishnan, A. Kavanagh, B. Varga, S. Ooghe, E. Nordmark
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IPv6 Maintenance
>> Area                : Internet
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
> 

-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494