FW: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 03:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C5D11E8137 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rbb5zGgolFXl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2292C11E8125 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHP68305; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:28:27 -0700
Received: from SZXEML418-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.157) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:28:27 -0700
Received: from szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.140]) by szxeml418-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:28:22 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNXaP3eifIRoHPo02wGSDOlR2P6pch3Hmg
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:28:21 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9239EF716C@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.31]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:31:04 -0000
Hi, all, We have submitted a new draft draft-jiang-semantic-prefix, "Semantic IPv6 Prefix". It proposes a framework to allow semantics to be embedded into prefix so that ISPs can easily apply relevant operations accordingly. All comments are welcome. Best regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 3:25 PM > To: Sheng Jiang > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Sheng Jiang and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-jiang-semantic-prefix > Revision: 00 > Title: Semantic IPv6 Prefix > Creation date: 2012-07-09 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 9 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt > Status: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00 > > > Abstract: > Some Internet Service Providers desire to be aware of more > information about each packet, so that packets can be treated > differently and efficiently. IPv6, with a large address space, allows > semantics to be embedded into addresses. Routers can easily apply > relevant operations accordingly. This document provides analysis on > how to form semantic prefix and corresponding use cases, and > identifies the technical requirements to maximize the benefits of the > semantic prefix approach. It is recommended to use 4~12 bits in > prefix for embedded semantics. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat