RFC 3306 question
Kerry Lynn <kerlyn2001@gmail.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4303D21F8C72 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.128
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.470, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKq6MPASh6au for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A7221F8C6F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywm21 with SMTP id 21so336191ywm.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fyqnArHRFzv89Zxi4fD4dF0v4Z8uyaJphQpLrlTz9Sw=; b=Z9K7vnNORwsxPfIrmrj3Ofi6PwcLnnsGU/lnQVAHcoH0HebR5lknsTTDL6e0EQlQNH q+q6+qwOysn6CTGAiDbzX6MwqaF+xCfuFtEniX2lQuspTcRrrABiu7qNvxkvbjGvK3Ps 92FJb6P47jLUSjJ3dxxKlIWu2/wFJHosgeQKg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.133.202 with SMTP id hz10mr6908701icc.357.1312926663057; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.53.70 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:51:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CABOxzu1MYxEW_1O1AQP91xgw2TT81-_=6YAKhsMW=4Y142tiyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RFC 3306 question
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307f369c5e22a204aa198f49"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:08:05 -0700
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:50:34 -0000
RFC 3306 states: "The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address MUST NOT exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast address." I'd just like to verify my interpretation that site-local multicast addresses MAY be formed from ULA prefixes? If so, should a particular value (e.g. 0x0000) be used as the subnet ID portion of the prefix? Thanks, -K-
- RFC 3306 question Kerry Lynn
- Re: RFC 3306 question Sander Steffann
- Re: RFC 3306 question Brian Haberman
- Re: RFC 3306 question Tim Chown