RE: CRH and RH0

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 13 May 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D373A1008 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.271
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.271 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Opn2aUFq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=fqVTT8ht
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUdxeiKxuLK5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4823A1005 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04DFbd2w025109; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:52:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=VIPflbo8iWXSm8a0HUcBIQoYy3IYiRumtm6y/PYeK0g=; b=Opn2aUFq9DFs91ihnzNcNNT8gKHIHaD+N7DVTvY90j5AFb06bQNZbkTuIcsV5eCbNa1Z xvR87OHLlMK4JwqdmgtALwNtrOAvQgg6EWtzeKX8rm2W376LNbHYXEGimWp1ZwVuKtTI iG6H72xEzOlwvsLh5k/x0uJVnSFNg0z56HJa+qUXhps+TdKnpQESiuDaen/tj93YIr8P hMMt2eJFQ1ojdKryScL+9PuNQ2ECjbLe60JE/B8svVXxFhgINu49ewYgGOAnbN21lxf8 rpDwvaRCtHat2RTm+lwD4mIo2jgUWubQRcsnFlQ4ulk22JP/lnKHW+LkYu168WSAtN9y RQ==
Received: from nam02-cy1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp2055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.55]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3100y4svy9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 May 2020 08:52:24 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=J0uXuoOHIGmdz0avJIDq4j671SjDZvfQf9e1AVsw4M2FL0MQW18UbSk1h6D1JEyWlxmhTGT5yWHF1K+KRCpCHmXMi0LT7qdHDVAfkOz8Prc8jDzHaign9Kbn/zuH04I0i7b/6PFI7lPHrKETXlAfPiDbOIXzypbu4HAe2J2R+GVqklS8ESu1UNaHzfMvUDsO2QdnHkczNOA2OsTSVFNMkQa12DvzFkuKrrN/qdajUQJk9aKG0rrxUUd/Trm820lcW7EJUA+WFazCcZ0fMLw2kyZqMgkcsJGD82u/9fGxTj6SreMiNPadvlfPH1Juoal/iRl8MGQDJKpISMSZNB+oDQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VIPflbo8iWXSm8a0HUcBIQoYy3IYiRumtm6y/PYeK0g=; b=J+diLJjXhiZd99GX8x1Y5HJvNz4+ySoLHZobswhWtkqIqCsQ96wR7mRQjoKWiBeaEZNeGBSAEFGQCk1HmI4Hm3Q0gFrk6Z2rJh25R+Y6y453MIpKofhHtMpvkHw9dAWdB+Pe8eSMCp1CJ1/ht0AABpo6sWVobpWPQWzOUd3hVjnd/sVHnT3s/AOfy3ga/4KJKI4qwv1K21nH6UNxUITGjT68OM9xcAmJCUIOkjgSoNCRXs30i6o2Hzrt7wU/CN0SirEvKltRVNjp0OBb7xZBtl0ANe4myKjCxjPhk917VeIxCGZrqEcsh1mP77cF1Bu7eHSsiaXMas4pDUWzllquZg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VIPflbo8iWXSm8a0HUcBIQoYy3IYiRumtm6y/PYeK0g=; b=fqVTT8htvRXOGe48Cu3yq4Xuetr1lApDFpAIYuBDFG9HkFNDoPCDIEWA8xi27OxYupzVTM60x0Wf3pg2E5Q0E54k61hiy6fpfUEbCJ+Hx0i56lH24Ibso8Amjc65AUb3YIQjKDdRwXFeb6bBbLrymkDMQkf5xkP+Fmtl+48r5c0=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB4489.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:9c::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.15; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:52:21 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3000.016; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:52:21 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: CRH and RH0
Thread-Topic: CRH and RH0
Thread-Index: AQHWKIrekPzaF/ez9Eqx/n5++hge6KikxRdQgAAHSoCAAAawsIAAFmwAgAAOYhCAAATmgIAAAbKwgAAC7gCAAANz0IAAC7qAgAAaGoCAAHLDgIAAfRNwgAAI9oCAAAQroIAAAb+AgAABu6A=
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:52:21 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB6348465D7970FE4EDF8CDD0AAEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4EDFE9A2-A69C-4434-BB0A-960C2453250F@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348FE6E3A45320C2A47EB66AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8068EBE1-38DD-411E-A896-EB79084BBCC4@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348326B0F72A009DB4F7746AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <942AF8C7-079E-4C81-95AB-F07A182E8F19@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB63483621F4AD3DEACA6FAF35AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <6F11579E-0F8A-48EB-86EC-945E17C11BF4@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB6348345A76F32CE07392AA58AEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3C800B54-6E3B-483A-8FA0-50075043DFD1@employees.org> <DM6PR05MB63480871BD73F8D35A3D501AAEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <E800E9A3-C05B-41E0-B752-3E0D067BDBE5@gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB63489AD43E07A2CDED86E274AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHGyn8-QJJbsL9=wYdzNeE8UPSHMjcwhvCMyx=AsuF4AA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB63481EC429A8A02E0064B3E5AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMF15aT7YBR-rqvqpjF=HXqyKPhVSOjHbS_X4sZV8s9bEg@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB6348B730373B31CFBFDB63F5AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGMgKT_n0ZKHvVVw1kf6-Fbb2D0=eK6xSesPX5D9321kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGMgKT_n0ZKHvVVw1kf6-Fbb2D0=eK6xSesPX5D9321kw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-13T15:52:12Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=4901016a-0ee4-4a5f-b4e8-d0e6f765c774; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: raszuk.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;raszuk.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: efe316ff-684a-4f02-925a-08d7f7559f96
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB4489:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB4489F21B57BE0DFD8339026FAEBF0@DM6PR05MB4489.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0402872DA1
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(33430700001)(7116003)(186003)(53546011)(71200400001)(478600001)(2906002)(6506007)(5660300002)(7696005)(9686003)(4326008)(8936002)(66556008)(26005)(33656002)(316002)(86362001)(66446008)(33440700001)(52536014)(54906003)(66946007)(66476007)(55016002)(64756008)(76116006)(8676002)(6916009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB6348465D7970FE4EDF8CDD0AAEBF0DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: efe316ff-684a-4f02-925a-08d7f7559f96
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2020 15:52:21.6171 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ynryJGZNmw/RC/NFJGw/HmFgirQcNeGzO/63riboxF5nZxOJNl51E0gpzy934sO42kfEpnISdnTxR3spY1DIvg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB4489
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-13_07:2020-05-13, 2020-05-13 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=995 cotscore=-2147483648 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005130138
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4Hbtzl9Z9ueO4d8hFpxVFPqW2JM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:52:28 -0000

Robert,

I am glad to hear that you are not calling me a liar. Now, let's continue the conversation.

It sounds like you are saying that the 6man WG cannot standardize some class of Routing headers without permission from the SPRING WG. Can you draw a clear boundary around that class of Routing headers?

                                                                           Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:43 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: CRH and RH0

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

It is not about existence of people.

It is about what the draft proposes vs what segment routing is in general.

You stating that people are not interested in SR but yet want segment endpoint encoding as described in the draft is very confusing at best,

Many thx,
R,

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:39 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> wrote:
Robert,

So, you are really sure that these people don't exist. Would you like to make a more explicit statement?

                                                                  Ron



Juniper Business Use Only
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:22 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>>; 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: CRH and RH0

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

>  Are you questioning whether that statement is true?

Yes. Especially this point: " Are not interested in SR"

Your draft only talks about SIDs and segments so no matter how you call it the core purpose is segment routing.

Take care,
R.

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:13 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> wrote:
Robert,

At the interim meeting, I said that there are IPv6 operators who:


*         Want CRH

*         Are not interested in SR

*         Are averse to SRv6

Are you questioning whether that statement is true?

                                                          Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 3:22 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com<mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com>>; 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: CRH and RH0

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Ron,

Given that it is only fifteen pages long, I suspect that progressing it would be less work than arguing about whether to progress it.

Sometimes committing a bit more work yields much better results in the long run ...

So it is clear that you are not just trying to fix suboptimalities of IPv6 encoding out of the woods. The goal is clear to get this in and use it as a hook to show in SPRING and other routing WGs in IETF that since you have CRH accepted as a WG docs in 6man other groups should follow along and work on SRm6 encodings.

The mapping plane between SIDs and labels is already in place in SR-MPLS. Just changing few bit here and there does not make new proposal to stand on its own.

I think it has been clearly stated by 6man chairs and AD that any work on SRm6 can be taken on only after SPRING WG accepts the main concept and adopts the main doc as a WG item.

So I recommend we go via this proper path with the full picture in mind and the ultimate objective for CRH.

Best regards,
R.