Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6 subscriber learning default gateway

otroan@employees.org Fri, 10 March 2017 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402BF1293F3; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:11:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IvTqChB2-6SL; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esa01.kjsl.com (esa01.kjsl.com [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F7A120725; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org ([198.137.202.74]) by esa01.kjsl.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2017 21:11:29 +0000
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A53D788A; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:11:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=from :message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :cc:to:references; s=selector1; bh=bAlVRitQbnu/eQ79+C/1laNCg94=; b= N8+xPrz0Ad70jCsNyNGNVOVxLjGHjFh/QOoL3ESIvf/beDVzZdjrYl9ck0+FdxN9 p5vxSR7+DLHV5u0NCNCmNF7fPMTywtk4Yg4cmYxbsmWJbCT1lzd3g8StiDcJ+cVp Xt1wSnv5QGITPtf+Sq24UwlS0yTYOOdr8xmlqvUkXYU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=from :message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :cc:to:references; q=dns; s=selector1; b=a8UCjgNnldQGh8mZrnJWX2K gYic/2qIDyfqE7bmemTrWWDvrCMaXKIjAGkw5BarUKGTnhl22+ix4CE42qYmHyNo L5OzYhzE5qGmXyCBlBY9loA5X1tdnUr1jOZk1PzB61kbqxU/XCAQop0Qgp8wpBfl ziwyk0KKqBYiwWhGzCsA=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (96.51-175-103.customer.lyse.net [51.175.103.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AF2ED788D; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E669B1928C; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:11:27 +0100 (CET)
From: otroan@employees.org
Message-Id: <3F64E796-5126-4405-8A81-AD9BAB6B7838@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F94854D2-09AA-43B9-82C0-6A1D6CE5B608"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6 subscriber learning default gateway
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:11:27 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A3DE11AA-D92F-4316-A177-BA8049B6FFB5@cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <CANFmOtnDgu=L3MKW7LZwR4Wg9zGDxkfsT7MZhcmOb=dBEBfUMQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170310.080331.41692443.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CANFmOtkgC9vHqg=5b4198QUYOrFJWSVL1xTOtdV5mRdBe4NbeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANFmOtmHDkR4y40Cp4PNL30RNAxDvT_p6K_v8ZE29FBf00f2jQ@mail.gmail.com> <268482ea-d5c1-ba1c-4c89-e0abdc709c96@gmail.com> <A3DE11AA-D92F-4316-A177-BA8049B6FFB5@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/dn2MXEQGSXEOY7aNM5lbfjK5Adw>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:11:32 -0000

>>   You are not the only person who thinks this is a gap in DHCPv6.
> 
> As a DHC WG co-chair, if v6ops and 6man believe this IS something that should be addressed in the DHCPv6 protocol, we can certain discuss with our AD to take it on. In the past, it seemed the view from these WGs (perhaps mostly 6man) was to leave it for RA to convey the default gateway.

if the only tool you have is a hammer...
stop beating a dead horse. it hurts.

Ole