Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sun, 26 February 2017 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1479D1298C7; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:15:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L2iLdAj5o7VQ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BCE1298C4; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 05:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.83] (unknown [181.165.116.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C51E805E5; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:15:50 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
References: <148599296506.18647.12389618334616420462.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6dbbbf7d-b3b8-0fbc-c2a3-546472925893@si6networks.com> <9B712605-E180-4F33-806F-9DC5CBAD2E31@steffann.nl>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <456cf6e5-a57b-8198-4261-1ff2c0dc1e1c@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:05:59 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9B712605-E180-4F33-806F-9DC5CBAD2E31@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/dsqBoLqnDu3uapcEvZmbLh512MQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:15:58 -0000

On 02/26/2017 09:55 AM, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> 2.3.  Address Type Identification
>>
>>   The type of an IPv6 address is identified by the high-order bits of
>>   the address, as follows:
>>
>>      Address type         Binary prefix        IPv6 notation   Section
>>      ------------         -------------        -------------   -------
>>      Unspecified          00...0  (128 bits)   ::/128          2.4.2
>>      Loopback             00...1  (128 bits)   ::1/128         2.4.3
>>      Multicast            11111111             ff00::/8        2.6
>>      Link-Local unicast   1111111010           fe80::/10       2.4.6
>>      Global Unicast       (everything else)
>>
>>
>> I wonder if this table should explicitly call out ULAs, and provide a
>> reference to the corresponding section.
> 
> ULAs are not an address type, they are Global Unicast. Adding them here might confuse people. And if we include ULAs then there is lots more that we should include as well. So while I understand your question, I think it would be better not to.

The "confusing" part is that, while globally unique, their scope is not
really global -- i.e., they are not meant to be globally routable.

Wasn't there at some point an I-D aiming to clarify what "global" meant?
-- IIRC, authored by Brian et al.

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492