IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD2911E80F4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JZ2nSPA4cEh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186AF11E8081 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail85-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.253) by VA3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.7.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:54 +0000
Received: from mail85-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail85-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CC3100330; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -6
X-BigFish: VS-6(zz1432Nzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail85-va3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=dthaler@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail85-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail85-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1334097173595748_32721; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.243]) by mail85-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF7B2C0046; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by VA3EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.7.99.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:49 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.4; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:47 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.4.253]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:32:47 -0700
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Topic: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Index: AQHNC+wBSVlewb1jE0uYOWOUBxq41JZ/ZbAAgBPdqECAAOdQAIAAkKBA
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:46 +0000
Message-ID: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B508719@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F726C9E.50107@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5054C1@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F83D8D0.5030402@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F83D8D0.5030402@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:32:56 -0000

Brian Carpenter writes:
> > The wording I propose to add is:
> > 
> >     "There SHOULD be an administrative option to change this preference, if the 
> >     implementation supports privacy addresses.  If there is no such option, there 
> >     MUST be an administrative option to disable privacy addresses."
> > 
> > -Dave
>
> That works for me. Perhaps there also needs to be a general statement in the security
> considerations that all administrative changes and options MUST be secured against illicit use.

Done.   Draft -02 now includes the wording above, and adds a general statement in the
security considerations section as you suggested.

-Dave

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email