Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-10: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Kathleen Moriarty
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for updating the Security Considerations section, I was glad to
> see the references added to the fragmentation work that had already been
> done.  If the TLS and SSH reference remain in the document, references
> would be good - RFC7525 and RFC4250-4254, but my preference would be to
> delete the sentence as this document is about IPv6 and developers and
> implementers of this standard wouldn't need those references, IPsec is
> enough.

Thanks for clearing Kathleen. I personally think that adding
Informative references to RFC7525 and RFC4251 should be fine.

Regards
Suresh