Re: Pseudorandom Flow Labels

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 05 April 2011 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46E23A67F1 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.271, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJKNhIfMsa7w for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FC3A67EB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Received: from relay11.apple.com ([17.128.113.48]) by localhost.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LJ7009FY8ARG4C1@localhost.apple.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807130-b7c15ae000005aca-0a-4d9b8d3a269c
Received: from et.apple.com (et.apple.com [17.151.62.12]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 85.D1.23242.A3D8B9D4; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.193.13.64] by et.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJ700BNS8E1Q640@et.apple.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Pseudorandom Flow Labels
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <201104052036.p35KaoHV019253@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:25 -0700
Message-id: <19204E85-5B6E-409C-B450-7E3AC5EF47FA@apple.com>
References: <BD901061-96AC-4915-B7CE-2BC1F70861A5@castlepoint.net> <201104052036.p35KaoHV019253@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1213)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: 6MAN Working Group <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:42:44 -0000

On Apr 5, 2011, at 13:36 , Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
> Case in point about how we are being *extremely* loose in using the term "pseudo random".

I share your concern.  Would replacing "pseudo-random" with "low discrepancy" address your concerns?


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>;
member of technical staff, core os networking