Re: 64share v2

otroan@employees.org Tue, 10 November 2020 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25C33A08A9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:38:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZEKiMLuuobD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADC2A3A0858 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (201.51-175-101.customer.lyse.net [51.175.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3E7B4E11AFD; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3270D43B20DA; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:38:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: 64share v2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011101234290.15604@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:38:52 +0100
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <164BCB66-5B0F-4BBF-AB0B-417B95F4431F@employees.org>
References: <CAD6AjGR-NE_sJ_jp7nAT6OvNkcdE9qoWuGEiiVW7r9YtsQvbbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0G8PjzE+pULte_AaOi=RHMLyto-YUQerGjQ=iOYnz+iA@mail.gmail.com> <0986B112-2159-4045-87F9-876B58F1D896@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0h9=7p+n=qnH1o1EHqtPrsaYebgvHciOJpP3=iXgNgKQ@mail.gmail.com> <0C739112-D8EA-42C3-BEFD-88C014D5BCD0@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr3Xr2t8yN40kmq6S+gSMPMDkm6cVXaVM+doW-xPo_BTrQ@mail.gmail.com> <55A3AF63-83FF-4D1B-8B18-AD2E7C35E441@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011101234290.15604@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/eMWXjUt4rHV2o0-DaFnI8JqHns0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:38:58 -0000

>> In an arbitrary topology, i.e. with multiple routers and hosts.
>> Why do you do think this will work?
> 
> This problem exists regardless of how the prefix is delegated or how big it is. There is always the requirement to send zero preferred times down the topology and also to support flash renumbering.

But you see the difference right?
RA configuration tied to link state. PD assignment not.

Obviously both can be misconfigured. But as I think we have experienced. Getting the defaults correct, both in standards, implementations and understanding is important.

Cheers,
Ole