RE: Interested in wireless ?

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> Sent: lundi 1 juin 2020 21:19
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Interested in wireless ?
> 
> draft says:
> >    To protect their bandwidth, some
> >    networks throttle ND-related broadcasts, which reduces the capability
> >    for the ND protocol to operate as expected.
> 
> I suspect you mean ND-related multicasts, and not ND-related broadcasts.

I meant ND-related MAC-layer broadcasts. L3 multicast turned in L2 broadcast.
But I see that the paragraph needs clarification, will do it for the next publication.


> 
> Also, I guess that need to protect (maintain availability) bandwidth is different
> when more and more bandwidth is offered by a PHY/MAC in a terahertz range.
> Maybe these networks will stop throttling(?)

I do not have a crystal ball for that. Look at Ethernet, now in the 100s of Gigs in the DC.
With the overlays and distributed cloud, the desire to eliminate broadcasts is more intense than ever.

Keep safe,

Pascal

> Alex
> 
> Le 01/06/2020 à 21:12, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> > draft says:
> >>    The routers send RAs with a SLLAO at a regular period.  The period
> >>    can be indicated in the RA-Interval Option [RFC6275].  If
> >> available,
> >>    the message can be transported in a compressed form in a beacon,
> >>    e.g., in OCB Basic Safety Messages (BSM) that are nominally sent
> >>    every 100ms.
> >
> > I suggest to give CAM as an example as well, not just BSM.
> >
> > It might be that on some continent CAM is more important than BSM.
> >
> > It might be, that in an ideal world where all use Internet, there is
> > just one CAMBSM message, and maybe we get to that if we put it on IP.
> >
> > But until then, citing just BSM is not good enough.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > Le 30/05/2020 à 13:46, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) a écrit :
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> Since there’s so much energy on the list these days, could we
> >> consider the adoption of
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-05
> >> ?
> >>
> >> I got only positive feedback, there’s no politics, there no label,
> >> it’s all about IPv6 models for wireless. This may appear useful in a
> >> world where the vast majority of devices are connected that way.
> >>
> >> Keep safe,
> >>
> >> Pascal
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------