IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why /64

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E7F11E821E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYtldNu74a5y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8383811E823D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id aq17so11059798iec.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MRvABk7LnAM7tSOHQqZZtYDzMr4meR8dmo7aKvrIZKk=; b=ecsggCfDQTEngeHOxDzfrc/EpCAhqBzrf3qWrUzPQdCJlgSkcnTWbGIYgrFtmbdJHA /Owx0fEz1ql0aey5FLUzANo3z1eyBde6DK9tT9CdQSTanKLP9rrF2x86D+bHvaSjpK2r sKCK6qoRq77JVjyE8VG2beoUrmMuQrUUFr/frwYaLut3vedVT/iMNSJHEBFCRW6WAVE9 DRnYqS7yziqGEcZKtFvS68SCvPOEtqqO1N4O21vNZdyvJUDEdL07BYdqhsFv2a2Zxtim yfkr8s07078mOb+0mVRngbqtqWPq4AhJ2njP4tjdI3zIyYH+rx7wpQQTVMpfnXbuynC/ bHKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MRvABk7LnAM7tSOHQqZZtYDzMr4meR8dmo7aKvrIZKk=; b=cimm9fcjeGLuDTl1ZsXqnTmT5VPd0T0QWjn5XCOfeWEXujFKepKX3+9nYFPdDIEWG0 GohNfTcQfOyRXgqr+knxh3zkO7RYfCy03/BptPfhB+uusLOEYSImIHQKHOBcNFZE4293 gSee2YR8njJqG+kV0UUE2imjd0d2VGVK5sJHNZZXt9qmToRqGNuyPOQ9/TpiiMUS1gax MCoc8UkSOdvLLw1QE4xWihr4v9RQibCfUrINn9rg2o7HdsxTy2lz81/P+XzSr58Zvo4h ehiLqacrKS+uBZWW72h+669bzuq6kKz+5qbHrDhgJJDKtFrlFI5P1rIEWL4dkHE8WU+C Ep8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYb+IjPkzES65YbvM2zpYs41XyaL1ZBTMvvar1+GL8BgnK+TcgqW/RGwnPZ0b7yV4PcaW4KcNDrAMiKh3UgWOE2oTtI9mSrpNK8vMC0VmiabRBJOJWJrlrb/yJW/dVtymfZgyF80p0GO1N7TW44r0eFQM+V5Agm6/QbdyODWXsy7CCf9GG4F0ATQoVvoYCJo8SJuNU
X-Received: by 10.50.153.50 with SMTP id vd18mr7642334igb.6.1382950658755; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526E267E.2070705@massar.ch>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <526AA24F.6010609@gmail.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr0_anudWNpWRkvMGvD_pvyEscnuqEsPUy4YNm3e9Hue9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP9k_J2GCOFhTCBz3U-nQmCWSjc4nceexaWwYZ-nDMpJmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SG1PC_kA-pO5Or8VyeaOzvLfpmQe0LiiYkXU_HzNqGzCQ@mail.gmail.com> <526E250E.5050607@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1evbMf1pD4yBrZyvF2XLXGOre3bHDB0gOZTLme7vnh2A@mail.gmail.com> <526E267E.2070705@massar.ch>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:57:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1K+4H+Gq9dWK-tVJu_3_pw+q7Q1owGz69eg6jy--XN5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why /64
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a009ec2143c04e9c94a59"
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:57:40 -0000

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> wrote:

> >     I am NOT arguing that a /64 should go the way of the dodo.
> >     I am only stating that this "IPv6 Privacy Address" thing is a myth.
> >
> >
> > Can you do so on another thread, please? This thread is about /64.
>
> You do realize that YOU made that point right?
>

Yes, and I withdrew it. I withdraw it again. Please let's not talk about it
on this thread any more.

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status