Re: Updated IID length text

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 19 January 2017 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8703E12940F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:01:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYS8v9h2X9O4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A128F1294C1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id r136so21292271vke.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:01:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AGL5f0oxvBegNVxz1Y+Sbiv38dzm2uLHHMIxyr8zH0A=; b=ELf8qzNKLQBjtDVQiV9WAYkP9HjObxyw1qEJsq3KCp9643xryYtIvUTwqWleVpVdZN f8wUPDoSVBKdBH9oqU1+VyTvh8CaWvLdIcnw3/UB1ggayXHUiAH6n5NG7cDmHXsD7SDX tgF3ppJSx7V6kiH5s3M4IA0prydkEgiTUyuAD5cdLs884+2d8v8Ni5nrrmOU/30mxj0m Rx0BtJaXx5PLIMbmnoHNyjUF8ePwtWZ5UhKfdz4hJut9de1zmL9J4hIZ5Kejpz3q3JEg UZe5jMX8H0plvydaANM2o/SL4fUtQuB86GArePx32X5Vt6tb12abxOq6HIFSLlLUbMm+ 03ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AGL5f0oxvBegNVxz1Y+Sbiv38dzm2uLHHMIxyr8zH0A=; b=cDchtIUXXwFwso9YvXUfci1oTclmZ6/D1mNllQ3Grnw3OsQZEi/SkA3WMREjCl3Rkl 0827jlHxcTp7EIpu0QrAglloCjFC0gy+GTk4jz0Rh/KBLQVHQPgjTBcvX1+y9ewMM+9Z HRSZ+sgogNWtsXbvL+jx5DVq+qF2x32UEJonBVzaFC+d452qeKM3eUT0c6dEj8cbfTL4 c/QqSs18dERdx6Kh5OfoD0k5Fv6wKMd0DHRsKobecZU2tvgVA5/6wsPHwW4roRzOpOG6 xxTJZD/Qqqa7yElRk7ZHriSlcvDibtswEiHCGzgebKhhVN1mVC0f2tf8fYmAyrnBpLzt paWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKRib425XGhwGNKEUhZlT8bMf/WzZ3eIm6JMEKirJtdvJqqCq9P5r9QalWRtNXmciLJ3VpYev1IhieOrl3Y
X-Received: by 10.31.192.204 with SMTP id q195mr3192265vkf.155.1484794874608; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:01:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:00:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <fcc7f136-b5da-527e-b495-5a2d7f7a3ce8@gmail.com>
References: <148406593094.22166.2894840062954191477.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2fukqbbwv.wl-randy@psg.com> <F6953234-3F85-4E28-9861-433ADD01A490@gmail.com> <m2wpdzhncn.wl-randy@psg.com> <82245ef2-cd34-9bd6-c04e-f262e285f983@gmail.com> <m2d1frhjfn.wl-randy@psg.com> <18e6e13c-e605-48ff-4906-2d5531624d64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1cvZ8Y3+bHeML=Xwqr+YgDspZGnZi=jqQj4qe2kMc4zw@mail.gmail.com> <m2lguffnco.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr1TrTiPRdyutobmb_77XJ7guNzLrg=H_p7qi4BfQ8V=GA@mail.gmail.com> <m2d1frfm6m.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2Njjd8_Mr+6TRFF6C5pdcX4yFgpFVyEkykDuytu2B8mg@mail.gmail.com> <2A5073777007277764473D78@PSB> <4596c3d4-a337-f08e-7909-f14270b7085f@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau06R3iYRpYLADhvHox4C9qdsJCuxFsJapRhOQcWT4qk_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2weZcoHiBzN94QAQ9WGhWR16PmMMFNg=5YLmr_dhPjjpA@mail.gmail.com> <fcc7f136-b5da-527e-b495-5a2d7f7a3ce8@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:00:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2Y8yY5=E3VUNuJqPsxeEJ2AMJM2ShKyQhQJRiO7fq3HA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updated IID length text
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114388cc11132c054669bf7e
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/eqcywc1sbsA5dXKyE_ueWhUv4TM>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 03:01:17 -0000

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> However, consistent use of Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
>    (SLAAC)[RFC4862] requires that all interfaces on a link use the same
> length
>    of Interface ID. To guarantee interoperability of SLAAC, a fixed length
> of
>    Interface ID is necessary.


I'm not a fan of this text, because it's a weak argument. A possible
(uninformed) response to it might be "why do we need this SLAAC thing
anyway? I want to use /120 prefixes and DHCPv6, just like I do in IPv4".
And really, SLAAC is only one of the reasons why we have a 64-bit IID.
There are lots of good arguments for this in RFC7421 - solid arguments,
about address scarcity and future flexibility, and so on. We should let
those provide the rationale since they can give a much more complete
picture than we can in two lines here. Since you cite RFC7421 just a couple
of lines down, I would just strike this text entirely, since it looks like
the text is only there to justify the following normative text.

I think I'm fine with the text that precedes it ("   IPv6 routing is based
on prefixes of any valid length up to 128 [BCP198]. For example, [RFC6164]
...)" and the text that follows it.