IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] changes in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 25 July 2021 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A6D3A0D02; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 18:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ggtDwoVQhSJc; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 18:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F13E3A0D01; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 18:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GXQdy5mRSz2xKk; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: [Cbor] changes in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05.txt
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriUnfMjhk7teAN-A0j5SCK=BpyJEDC+NOCJtHzmF1BFeow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:37:10 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 648869830.346019-08246ca44f7bced93fc5c292977dc064
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CDF0D7F6-7017-4C1C-90A5-63B7D9696C70@tzi.org>
References: <162608928922.11086.12172415971165753394@ietfa.amsl.com> <29067.1626090045@localhost> <CAMGpriUnfMjhk7teAN-A0j5SCK=BpyJEDC+NOCJtHzmF1BFeow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/etWHqNHWICKEuett009CyQO0vAM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 01:37:19 -0000

> On 2021-07-25, at 00:42, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 169.254.x.y,

Hmm.
RFC 6874 only defines Zone Identifiers for IPv6.
Should we support IPv4 here as well?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email