Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 10 November 2017 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74053129512; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:35:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6OQ0RlX1FWj; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC835129508; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:35:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rQOaFxjkeRgw6DhtYlSQj3sT4UmGK1i3Ekjp4WICksA=; b=wyB3veUFbe7Kd96bgqnTtCxpd/ jrwCbHHBmXkoR0a2CwkDOLOh+e5CM5SWd7al/Zc5NnxPG9gvGF2+r8Tq9EC7FmzD14TAjch4XHjgZ cD8Z0DE2sKFHRib2SKXN3C70vPCpkkDmMg1olK63c50fbUwkj6QFu+T3/o3s1d6udVe46v1bW+SXl PePSE+lcs5yee9e2Ymp7knVSh4DNDK1PaESVp5wshrIyJ/nWzdGyzlpn67JwPM2Qf/QpXdBozaYBy Av7dDvr6YeNYSvXskAPSneL53FoDfJaUkB85FVMwFMxD8kvYgLcFnkLPV3NJQoKVAGgm2dGGXeM7R lu8IDDmg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:61548 helo=[192.168.1.189]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1eD12O-000AZJ-QF; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 23:35:29 -0500
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "6man-ads@tools.ietf.org" <6man-ads@ietf.org>, "v6ops-ads@ietf.org" <v6ops-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host@tools.ietf.org>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <8efc982b0c784a6eac359d1ae9e50201@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <10f7ae3d-1de0-d7fb-b5fb-fe7a609cbf05@gmail.com> <DBE27830-1270-4FFA-8D1E-E97B234BEC45@google.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID: <8ecf1a4c-35bb-3cfa-5902-103732e98669@strayalpha.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:35:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DBE27830-1270-4FFA-8D1E-E97B234BEC45@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/f6oxsnpvzg_WVA010VHZ8GNNP3s>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:35:33 -0000


On 11/9/2017 3:01 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> i.e. the fact that I initially misunderstood how this BCP is not
> actually a protocol specification should be no reason to believe that
> any ordinary reader might make the same mistake. 

Given the time it has taken the discussion to come around to this claim,
it seems prudent to add text to the document to explain this reasoning.

Joe