Re: Why one Internet?

Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8116F21F865C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.218, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCndldp2oHvQ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23DD21F865B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so8262368obb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Um99f9YLJhVikwFE/8DUXOJYm50proBYmmy00UubVrk=; b=wQFZKWjSfDPjdF7ma964GeyS8OIrE2T5+nkLrfchEGxTyS78hw4W1zVQTH0OP3v477 vJNyBGDiJBh73WUhc1aogw6+As/gBD5KC1AFDq8jONFN0eBz7kFB+i1tVNflvo06ZmMb ymC0bXDvrN8jiejSWnyohAq08mvso3snaBJ3ntrknATrXBloHT/OJrmxBCgGp67xa6RO qhnZ1LJdeqph5SWnVF0wmgIRsuUuXkcCqyelCHO6jnmANR0YQa8EVg4TYvUlhYFK02b8 C0ieQ8WdkidexKh3Gczv5+RbkHcuOCI2sVlQZ8LaVELF5sm9xnjfH7UdDYdbuDH30bFT m6tw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.86.200 with SMTP id r8mr16480304obz.20.1334066330531; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.117.34 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2bomzy9pk.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <m2d37fy9v3.wl%randy@psg.com> <CACQuieZKW_1PKPXrMqrD8XoYQ_WO9rSHKb+fMRuLa5tLSWPD3A@mail.gmail.com> <m2bomzy9pk.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:58:50 +0300
Message-ID: <CACQuiearybNwvzqvLJBwkuY59xA+hrz18tQ9GP1mHnN1UBq0iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e9a3bcf83904bd53857f
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:58:57 -0000

No sir "not questioning" is being the nut case. Sorry.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > Why me?
>
> because you are the nut case who proposed it
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then
> another
> > > > one etc.
> > > >
> > > > We can have as many Internets as we need, all different.
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > in the words of vince perriello, send code
> > >
> > > randy
> > >
>