IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SRH insertion vs SRH insertion + encapsulation

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Sat, 07 September 2019 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB8C120B5E; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 05:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWdPs6zEq8l6; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 05:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96591120058; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 05:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.foobar.org (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x87Ch3m0002302 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 13:43:03 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.foobar.org
Subject: Re: SRH insertion vs SRH insertion + encapsulation
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion <draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
References: <CAOj+MMETQa=OfovZak35VfnY+T6qzU9BxAhmFMXz1b7kSppyQg@mail.gmail.com> <f1ac8b63-860a-4fee-141d-20bf9e1332cb@si6networks.com> <CAOj+MMG_KszYdMj27zDvAV+vtjRWPbHWoGErh_pRDvGOoVeqRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <f36e9d66-9898-3153-ed08-29c56c82506a@foobar.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 13:43:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/6.1.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMG_KszYdMj27zDvAV+vtjRWPbHWoGErh_pRDvGOoVeqRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/fGwTb7QOk71H9vAbyJCuz0lsd4c>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 12:43:08 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote on 07/09/2019 13:34:
>     So you are telling me that the document that proposes EH insertion
>     doesn't contain the rationale for it, and we should go and look
>     elsewhere?
> 
> 
> Deployment experience is never part of standards track document. And it 
> should never be.

Robert,

you're perilously close to suggesting that operational input is 
irrelevant to protocol standards development.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email