Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Sat, 09 April 2011 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86213A69B1 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id seqyQqvgwq0R for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2983A6905 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye19 with SMTP id 19so4791377iye.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IqdDhdYMCAp89YXZqIHwOD3qfdP1oNl2GKhbMnEh2jI=; b=HW0Nd8mC6UFIXVUl4tYkkTJoM1LmMmu0F54NxYObe43cWQeBUST0lyTZawwFdbBqyh /+ChuLG7IfpBRFaSeT9T6DDQQ7aJLiaA9G1as2DXk5lzz+STYCkEmQy9ee1WGcBD+Hu0 o+s+7z63Owu6KYGjbEqnYbiORur1BqBNnj+c0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=asAS66CLskEV66SOv/YA/Uzo1zycO/F465WIRBR37VxnCJvmZSSDYbouoyPsviw1Ic OCiWnXHl0Y4o+dcrlScdN/ET/ATnQ29k+BfXTaM34scpu07QJxQ4PMKABmld4jI+E1Vd KasaNG7+UAfJWanogNIYV88YTJtjGpYns0wR4=
Received: by 10.231.61.198 with SMTP id u6mr2768198ibh.160.1302307823154; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.92.16 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=acX_sU07OzO9-p+1e7Wh4RGsLFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=acX_sU07OzO9-p+1e7Wh4RGsLFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 02:10:03 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinR7J3fq0rrej8FW1QqGrkozrAYbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:08:38 -0000

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 01:01, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>; wrote:
> If enough people express support we can make this a BCP

That would be very welcome indeed.


>,  but whatever is
> done here, "the market" will decide on its own. .

If this poll [1] and the various feedback by operators is a reliable
metric, the market may have decided for hextet, already. And yes, I
should have used Condorcet [2] possibly modified for NotA.


Richard

[1] http://doodle.com/5q9gfvk4qe6zmzc6
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method