Re: default-iids: dropping requirement 1 in Section 3

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A04012D566 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6rgnMYz47GJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E43D12D4FE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x189so157427759ywe.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GRCVa/yz9JqFtZfW8QgvfOJCs1GFdqx+PJSNS8SMLGM=; b=XbJDax5x//j4qJgy0ww/SMHf487tA60jXtNHjH/C5Jepu9TF7/lru8+sKscE37MW/o KRAO0N9zYZKcPmQ8sp9AnyXFZ8Wfw3e87+U8NH0cg1xUWwV26s5BOdrSqASDXD1UQICq 00VMdjTFyAioox3dd8kB/gwm7B8K+wTO4xClS4AuGORNQLJwAazVPt/xT+ZxhUDYZU9p UVDjikFZAc5UmNA6J+HgBBwXYRMCC9RZzLuf4re753MKQ1Al8NMkwaAjZpsttSskbq48 OlkErHEu37GWb5RaErjXwQoM47/wogRTCJ5+EcA41hwwUYEl9i+y09xRy8VvSTITfa3T A71A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GRCVa/yz9JqFtZfW8QgvfOJCs1GFdqx+PJSNS8SMLGM=; b=W05v28dtmwA5ponZJsWMGP2QKwBMZioysivhXe4/xzPEgBqGAQql9NUZIZly71qmLN LC6SbWV5oPzQanAqrv7HmLWkl15bqPPHngiCVpGHxeKJmeY8HB90HicikukJ5/nxKtcB e+4PDTLLKodbVake/Ir+fylyO8BUTR/Kl45kQorBYOqoWr3IIeZnntOS3ItXNAFp94HH iq6ADScC7aIM/bKC/bm7831YJAEFoEx89Uof/UGC3ZB0yc03JkzUKzXRiE1HkHFg9JHt rJx23ZKWtJALItJ4jSVg2d9aY2608BF93pmetAXorA/k3A634TSQxpTzUQqCJ6h0k8+r ScKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWtd6Ua7qeRvGnWZgQSfwDE9DmL2/N1ZOg13SZe5uWpuI2XTH83DTOj7/EMBgv0wJ+BmSPgge8soUpJ+/J4
X-Received: by 10.13.220.69 with SMTP id f66mr8847196ywe.132.1463965948494; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.198.68 with HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57420B44.6080209@si6networks.com>
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <89CA2C18-AE61-4D40-8997-221201835944@gmail.com> <6f2edbbc-d208-03a0-3c33-503a05c0bee8@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1So_tFFSr=sk8ew-UJG-dWK=U6N9mwJnwkZdNX=__SVQ@mail.gmail.com> <11cf3f90-e693-a640-a372-f419a8f7a1a0@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0OPuSmp-OWG-+ZjDsHucQYTG2PMZw7jdiU=4kQqK+tyQ@mail.gmail.com> <663debf7-cfba-b19b-92ef-89cc66b452d8@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2Km2A6XO8nvNv31Ti_Rr2j4gse1KLadJPcrgFMKyzszw@mail.gmail.com> <31E1F934-FEA2-4338-8F2C-04E7302F3170@cooperw.in> <CAKD1Yr052q0-xTkgLmL8UM=bXAEypDiGHuEhtOhwc3qpoZWbDw@mail.gmail.com> <53e5543b-ebc2-9ca7-5275-693027d44088@bogus.com> <44990b39-65df-79b6-7074-7f53ba4fe035@gmail.com> <351E5A99-235D-4CD8-A237-3C70FB8EBB12@cooperw.in> <96468F91-2C94-4337-89CA-5AEEBB183ADD@cooperw.in> <57420B44.6080209@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:12:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3HOcbErk7D7ppxKa8Fd905-ynB1OiDLBBnQ0NCYfbV+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: default-iids: dropping requirement 1 in Section 3
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0815c8533dd50533782299"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/fx5Sqs8Mqb5vBd8HAsOPHtKBXyg>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 01:12:30 -0000

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:
>
> The root of this whole problem is embedding a layer-2 id in a layer-3
> field in the first place.
>

No, the root of this whole problem is embedding a *stable* layer-2 ID in a
layer-3 field.