FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
"Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> Thu, 06 May 2021 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE683A2D0F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjCjGP_40PO0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F90D3A2D23 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 146J8Slw007709; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:08:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1620328110; bh=PywojWuxAKA0n4fO3qThEPsfvcUG4VxG6mrXnenUkGc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=ZKzfJ12j+dCzPd6//BtaJ1aGRSief8CHkFJ9K9EI4KolbQFlt409CZWhx4ewwWnHY pUDhAuKWs4rTfNO2J8lRf3oFvX133rhSGlC4UmCn8Km9CXy8iAzZW6B0ZZPFLuEE8q rYn23muRcVJFIXjxjcNe/6vXOqgWqjof+i1PZkJNdUZg8eMLGa2aW21G8Bad1hmlqy JesRRAJStaZqfmTclXCLwqygAeVn0PZ4dCsf/WfIgGSoCPjCZ55YBlYwr4zn56SLJY e2cyMYzfVbBIjlGuFBSZ7JlfiyMDjCAb1M7O7t4WnS8ftzBF86kbS33gcd3+tHkpzm HtATEgM5ju8BA==
Received: from XCH16-01-10.nos.boeing.com (xch16-01-10.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.5]) by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 146J8M9l007661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 15:08:22 -0400
Received: from XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.39) by XCH16-01-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:08:20 -0700
Received: from XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::a96c:5d85:1337:4323]) by XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::a96c:5d85:1337:4323%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.008; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:08:20 -0700
From: "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
Thread-Topic: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
Thread-Index: AddCqszl40C6qECoSLC1U3DhxxZVPg==
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:08:20 +0000
Message-ID: <4f22f9591c0a48d1a351f52318cd3319@boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [144.115.204.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: CDC3DADB2BADA1137DC2BA1F886EAFACB361AE011C06A8E520675C2BB466F1EF2000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/giYeEQpbJzU_tYRSYXHaNYZ94Z4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:09:11 -0000
This is something that ought to be of interest to organizations which want to use their own semantics, in the IPv6 prefixes. There was some discussion on 6man some time ago, in which the assumption appeared to be, such a thing is already viable. Bert -----Original Message----- From: routing-discussion <routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2021 05:49 To: irtf-discuss@irtf.org; routing-discussion@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments. Dear all, Back in March we posted an initial draft to open the discussion of research related to routing based on additional meaning assigned to IP addresses, and to routing based on fields other than the destination address field of an IP packet. That draft attracted some comments, and one thing was clear: we needed to split the draft into a survey of work that has happened / is happening, and a discussion of the challenges to routing together with the research question. So we have done this now (sorry it took so long) and have posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-semantic-routing-survey/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-irtf-challenges-in-routing/ These new drafts do not pick up all of the comments received (we focused on the split), but we hope to address the comments in new revisions soon. At the same time, we have set up a dedicated mailing list for discussion of "Semantic Addressing Routing and Hardware" (SARAH) at sarah@jiscmail.ac.uk. This is an academic, research-based community where we can discuss all aspects of the drafts, introduce our research to each other, and advertise related conference activity. You can subscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=SARAH. We hope the new list will help to focus discussion and avoid spamming existing mailing lists. Looking forward to hearing your opinions. Adrian and Dan _______________________________________________ routing-discussion mailing list routing-discussion@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
- FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of S… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Robert Raszuk
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Brian E Carpenter
- RE: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Dirk Trossen
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Robert Raszuk
- Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges … Nick Hilliard