IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why one Internet?

Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0989111E80AF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvOq4oKd9YQs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8889F21F863E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so8253553obb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pCw2TQYSYVsO/s5PXyvkI8rtESTAzKDyztvq6DPcWSM=; b=LmRKaxrkP7NV/KRzJHdE/GyluRiqJCjYI+5cXmXrySRaC/Ogtm9YETzkHlCq1FKdsw 5Rpd2vWwDMvNMFBKXHhxpRxcqya+nKvdlLpfduF0GMSizsZ+qysSwPe+oqaLN5DYayJm lz47KWtqhRdGB19PGX6EjZwFlzaLq6/53HHkcUQPFx9KHpL+JqxLIyjKHNSOEn2xjCdY zKyju+pQtkz8m8j+TBg5ZHUjRGoDQM6lWnLAkx7g3D29+Lm/yIKFbGQRL5wZvgdPdsxH e2HW9bo+eThsWvLtfV8pRISaL54/TK3wESVEMNqXL1yrwFsfSF4c2698oC3y2UyKZgPg fGXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.174.101 with SMTP id br5mr16490387obc.0.1334065883204; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.117.34 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2d37fy9v3.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <m2d37fy9v3.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:51:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CACQuieZKW_1PKPXrMqrD8XoYQ_WO9rSHKb+fMRuLa5tLSWPD3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f646729134d6304bd536bc6"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:51:24 -0000

Why me?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then another
> > one etc.
> >
> > We can have as many Internets as we need, all different.
> > ...
>
> in the words of vince perriello, send code
>
> randy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email