IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 23 January 2014 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B531A03D3; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:27:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjqVBBNaLjpI; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:27:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:d10:2000:e::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C7E1A02C2; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:27:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 75-138-17-190.fibertel.com.ar ([190.17.138.75] helo=[192.168.3.102]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <fernando@gont.com.ar>) id 1W6JMz-0000jO-TA; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:26:54 +0100
Message-ID: <52E10557.6030502@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:04:39 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)
References: <20140122202434.30069.4084.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52E02EAD.1050009@si6networks.com> <52E03BAD.5050306@innovationslab.net> <52E04278.1000401@gont.com.ar> <52E0FF5C.8050906@innovationslab.net> <52E10153.8070001@si6networks.com> <52E104A4.3040701@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E104A4.3040701@innovationslab.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:27:31 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/23/2014 09:01 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> 
>> Regarding use of DNA as proposed in the suggested paragraph
>> above, I have no issues with it, although it seems orthogonal and
>> out of scope *here*. -- i.e., such note might make more sense for
>> the other document that has just been adopted. This one is about
>> what to do when you have already "decided" that you cannot reuse
>> the previously-assigned address.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Given the concerns raised by Stephen about storing addresses, I can
> see where employing the DNA approach for the Network_ID is a
> reasonable compromise.

Great.

Should I wait for Thomas response, and then rev to address all the
comments received so far? (Tim's, Stephen's, yours, Thomas', etc.)?

Thanks!
- -- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4QU7AAoJEJbuqe/Qdv/xffEH/3D6ieGh/WLaGKk8VWn382o7
8T4J62fUVbz1eUsbYQbBIy5IUeO62rD+96ITwbhjgjbCJFmVJfWjRLYM+cdDPz/f
EKOFa3sH3zYiIzSWz4SSmOoD3HHss8JO3GQV3l5p2AO0y6GnxM4oGseSrmFN88oT
8k4UvaJ4TLHM2KNiwwVStap4zOA/HttrIzXfzEdrTOjlijcm80ocBOsJlCNvLhwR
7RE8HodFSRzXzmNZKuCD47X5W42sQmzL1U/wYn9M9cppXVG3LFYTtLm3o4WFE9Mf
d945X2OC4Sa240o7qWOiOfn1TeEX65uDYZHNXcgKIILf/FTqG1K4f91Jw4RWvGY=
=+/qV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email