[IPv6]Analysis of Ungleich ULA Registry

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Thu, 23 May 2024 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549D3C14F6B8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 009JGqHdAWbv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p5.oit.umn.edu (mta-p5.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EA7C14F6AF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p5.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Vl9PB5Ldyz9vBsP for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 01:21:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p5.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p5.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lrjFu2riDVz for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2024 20:21:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p5.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vl9PB1xKMz9vBrq for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2024 20:21:34 -0500 (CDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mta-p5.oit.umn.edu 4Vl9PB1xKMz9vBrq
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mta-p5.oit.umn.edu 4Vl9PB1xKMz9vBrq
Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2e2264552e4so5844321fa.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; t=1716427292; x=1717032092; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Nr8FshTOW0Z3rG5RKKdVylpMMHGnL4OPnPttWCmfK3Y=; b=KefkFGEZ5FqQLkg7Imwa+eGZ6tKcdQPo5rEyPijI9Gl5XBcV8C3xr3vr20YltJepWU nuWXaPzkM6FLWPG6IzSNkyAPffSUf17OLAFsGUn7keuj1i8KyK7YfOEaJOez6qBftpAA z0KLMtaLra6oQeY6L8BLS9hcnbfAQCBRlyx8fS5CpgBW4CMF6WyfJQa4yCTHiJxnJK99 1x1IFu/v/a2dXkKQuXC/OMmIT08+FWGHjWej5+oOtiYk/8TCkr3gc07Sp1tY4TtQh/Ch LRz1krRFX3jRL2RGMsgUtgO6QoTMAziNKGblCOiiCONeBxB0IXX3whtG5Sp2A7doxlQd jRvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716427292; x=1717032092; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Nr8FshTOW0Z3rG5RKKdVylpMMHGnL4OPnPttWCmfK3Y=; b=HyQ6l3Xcvd9JA8HrWpuRDnOCmZFEYjAq0EFiErrBnGgYOvkxWOn7ciC0MhFJH7/4k9 XQkJGNMDisKIUaIKc7+URNolun2mFJNeDZGpxGl6UmTEONIJsnlWgrOOWNMQGpmkXjoe K7aO1LSwtnL5m4VMTsXVXTyzwjaJGZy8gCDWdnzfXeo5fuD9X0n02MGHTq4yFk4N/aea 3Ygl+D7ugOvJC/7r1BqWm6nQdtD5IzzruwNk1OXK1xLDqyo8R6yEiozuQ8+wrG1mvJ1I jqhBgSbfs/oCVNHTvJ/an1ZlA5Eyi0yEqY9LDqXxPUwPMhXRlZNvbAxPzkqVQQf6WZrZ d0zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzn9BQn11sSbIJXgedp2FK1o0/zFP2RrCKkfFPNbdiiPARBbZta pZFMNu0VImQd/mcUr4PoPmQ5LiRFN3Zx7DIc/P9zkuIHqr4/GSDcNlWVyKEZlYSQVIkl7BTiG78 sDCfCFWa1UD0tYy2PEZTlPewhHsNZuEXQPBOT4LAVQH6MaGmv7M+UjZoXkgw+oSaS9bxceX7sAg UsrcTRkleZG0Ue73wRdnT+SIKPZeUjNU4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0d0:0:b0:2e6:fd20:2982 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2e94944380dmr19637371fa.3.1716427292164; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtR2NJLYh0kdovtyD0xbVhJHOzQn+D4nympXUNFidorKgu1ISZaspfe9/AsQX+lvPvPAgxGPIFYyW7ep3hvm4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0d0:0:b0:2e6:fd20:2982 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2e94944380dmr19637291fa.3.1716427291391; Wed, 22 May 2024 18:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 20:21:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau0J1uqpwnRXYpeSFGUTJ532MmpeGd4BLoAqqf8HzeFTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc94e2061914ded8"
Message-ID-Hash: FYM3OZSZU3CGWHD7V6VQ2LS5TF4ELGE5
X-Message-ID-Hash: FYM3OZSZU3CGWHD7V6VQ2LS5TF4ELGE5
X-MailFrom: farmer@umn.edu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Analysis of Ungleich ULA Registry
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>

Summary Table

5963 Total Entries
4886 Unique Names
4305 Names with 1 Entry
581 Names with >1 Entry
8 Names with >10 Entries
83 Max # Name Entries
2217 No Org Entry
3117 Unique Orgs
2840 Orgs with 1 Entry
277 Orgs with >1 Entry
11 Orgs with >10 entries
34 Max # Org Entries

Some conclusions;

Many of the names and organizations with the largest number of entries are
generic entries. For example, there are 135 name entries with some version
of "Admin" or "Administrator" and 52 organization entries with some version
of "Private."

Nevertheless, at least a handful of what seem to be real organizations in
the registry purport to use more than 10 ULA prefixes. The limitations of
the new known-local ULA list in draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update could be
problematic for these organizations.

Also, given the number of names and organizations with multiple entries,
there seems to be some evidence for the need for ULA-C prefixes shorter
than /48, especially if an organization's justification for shorter
prefixes can be evaluated.

The Google Sheets file with the data and analysis details;
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Uw_vwhbIRtKCBkjAzqNr3U9PjtDC0T0f/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103218388452744950721&rtpof=true&sd=true

Thanks
-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================