Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-01.txt>
Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp> Mon, 26 October 2009 01:12 UTC
Return-Path: <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B906C3A68D0 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3hq+r6IU+N7 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.193]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997063A6890 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.161]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n9Q1CNHE017497; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id n9Q1CMS23983; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp [10.82.141.45]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n9Q1CMKN014908; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from bsac29088.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bgas200085.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/06101717) with ESMTP id n9Q1CMsF004099; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:22 +0900
Received: from mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (bgsx5626.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp [10.18.151.10]) by bsac29088.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/06101717) with ESMTP id n9Q1CMgg021256; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:22 +0900
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (edonet065.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp [10.19.137.65]) (authenticated bits=0) (envelope-from kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp) by mail.sys.biglobe.nec.co.jp (BINGO/BINGO/06101717) with ESMTP id n9Q1CMw1029283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:22 +0900
Message-ID: <4AE4F774.1030006@mesh.ad.jp>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:12:20 +0900
From: Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-01.txt>
References: <501E2743-9EFF-4D9A-A873-003DB8AF0381@gmail.com> <4AE2F6BB.50004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AE2F6BB.50004@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: 6man Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:12:15 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alex Thanks for your support and comments. Please see inline. Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > I support it. > > Half-substantive and half-editorial comments follow. > > draft: >> When the length of the >> consecutive 16 bit 0 fields are equal (i.e. 2001:db8:0:0:1:0:0:1), >> the former is shortened. > > The "former" when reading it left-to-right western latin style? Maybe > better "The most significant if represented in network byte order"? Or > similar. Yes, former as in western latin. > > Is there any intention to suggest this choice of placement of :: to the > IEEE Unix ("Austin Group") who standardizes what inet_pton and ntop do: > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/ Appendix A notes that inet_ntop (of FreeBSD7.0) follows Section 4. Linux implementations that I checked works the same also, but I've had a few people tell me some do not work this way. I've not been able to confirm this, but in most cases inet_ntop already does follow Sec4 placement of ::s > > ? > > Or at least add a reference in the draft about the inet_ntop and pton > standardization documents, which are IEEE (outside of IETF). > > Finally, is there some implementation prototyping in support of > recommendation of section 4? I think there may be already. inet_ntop :-) and ipv6calc works very nice too. Regards, Seiichi > > Alex > > Bob Hinden a écrit : >> All, >> >> This message starts a 2-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing: >> >> >> Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text >> Representation >> Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima >> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-01.txt >> Pages : 14 >> Date : 2009-10-18 >> >> >> as a Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of >> support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing >> list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the document editor. > > Who is the document editor? > > Alex > > > This last >> call will end on November 5, 2009. >> >> Regards, >> Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman >> 6MAN Chairs >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkrk93QACgkQcrhTYfxyMkKcwgCggL/Eupl8hs550DeKdgMuLGJb +YkAnihKuiSWx6/R0EojiQDdJjNGULRM =iPHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-rep… Bob Hinden
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… Seiichi Kawamura
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… Shane Amante
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr… Seiichi Kawamura