IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 09 April 2015 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039A71ACED3; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhIZIUy77czI; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449FC1ACEBE; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f790b6d000004359-9d-5525a42b1d30
Received: from EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.78]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id CE.6D.17241.B24A5255; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:56:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:58:03 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQchQYPW9Jzjp110CQbqz3eZfFSQ==
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 04:58:02 +0000
Message-ID: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF628B6F404@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <20150408155108.15627.15561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPn672EtVQgwW/xC12T5nGZjHjz0Rm i5dn3zNZrNi1ntVi+t5r7A6sHlN+b2T1WNt9lc1jyZKfTAHMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZPbsv sBVM4qjoXHqKvYHxEVsXIweHhICJxKq1kl2MnECmmMSFe+uBwlwcQgJHGSV+LpnCApIQEljG KDFpAVgRG1D9hp2fmUBsEQFPiYd9p1hA5jALFEv8veQFEhYWSJBY/+gbC0RJosTPpzOgyvUk 1q34AraWRUBF4tZZVZAwr4CvxItHS5ggNjlKrNwxiR3EZgQ65/upNWBxZgFxiVtP5jNBnCkg sWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/rBC2ksTH3/PZIep1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4mhlil6DEyZlPWCYwis5CMnYW kpZZSFpmIWlZwMiyipGjtDi1LDfdyHATIzBejkmwOe5gXPDJ8hCjAAejEg9vQrBKqBBrYllx Ze4hRmkOFiVx3rIrB0OEBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MMrK8Ec2nwiz/njOWv7D H0erW/P5H15YkVA0c+7zqa/vnX+3ecmsedwOKic3vwyaxdQyYbnQ5YNbZDZsN1OZ0r+dda/C n0nTp92b/7Bif2T990i9feIvzYI8lJ5f3b62w/HXyY5I65lema82n1np0BSesFhWmuvgsUrV 1p/Z+XMmfNt2dXqicoCtEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAswX3q3gCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/hdgNKARi3azvAr9KPpzIBR028Dc>
Cc: "ot@cisco.com" <ot@cisco.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 04:59:16 -0000

Hi Stephen,
   Thanks for your comment.

On 04/08/2015 11:53 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> security considerations: I note that RFC 4861 has been
> updated, including by RFC 5942, which specifically says it
> addresses a security concern in 4861. (I didn't check the
> others.) I think it'd be better to say here "beyond those
> discussed in [RFC4861] and RFCs that update that" or some
> such. Or point to all the relevant ones, or tell me that it
> doesn't matter for this:-)

Makes sense. Even though the security concerns from RFC5942 do not 
directly apply to the mechanism proposed in this document, there are 
other security updates to RFC4861 in the pipeline in 6man that may 
apply. Will include this phrase in the next rev.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email