Re: RFC7084
Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 10 December 2013 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCBF1AE0E0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:00:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc29xoDbld7f for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BC51AE106 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:00:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAIUrp1KQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4uXCBHRZ0giUBAQEDAQEBASRHCwUHBAsRBAEBKAcnHwkIBhOHfAYNwQsXjnoLBwaDG4ETBJAxiROQY4MqOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,865,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1964126"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2013 15:00:41 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-104-161.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-104-161.cisco.com [10.61.104.161]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBAF0axw011767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:00:37 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C30BB0EA-C784-4B92-AB5E-1A8045CDCE5C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: RFC7084
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DD181@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:58:52 +0100
Message-Id: <B83C25D3-59EB-4BD3-AFEB-F2D9A2508B67@employees.org>
References: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DC7BB@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0269@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCD72@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCE42@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <52A7236A.30605@viagenie.ca> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DD168@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <52A72500.6020009@viagenie.ca> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DD181@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com>
To: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:00:49 -0000
Carl, > M=1 equals Managed flag = request ia_na or/and ia_pd. > Please note a router is also acting as host. that is wrong. the M-flag does not give a hint about prefix delegation. the M flag is a hint from the network that stateful address assignment might be available. cheers, Ole > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perreault@viagenie.ca] > Sent: dinsdag 10 december 2013 15:28 > To: Wuyts Carl; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: RFC7084 > > Le 2013-12-10 09:25, Wuyts Carl a écrit : >> M=1 should not be equal to force request ia_na. > > What should M=1 mean then? > >> what's the purpose of having separate options (ia_na and ia_pd) if you're going to request both of them anyway ? > > The answer to that seems simple to me: an end host would never request IA_PD. Only routers would. > > Simon > -- > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca > NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- RE: RFC7084 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: RFC7084 Sander Steffann
- Re: RFC7084 Ole Troan
- Re: RFC7084 Sander Steffann
- Re: RFC7084 Erik Kline
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- RE: RFC7084 Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: RFC7084 Sander Steffann
- RE: RFC7084 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: RFC7084 Simon Perreault
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: RFC7084 Simon Perreault
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: RFC7084 Ole Troan
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: RFC7084 Ole Troan
- RE: RFC7084 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ole Troan
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Nick Hilliard
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ray Hunter
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: [v6ops] RFC7084 Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: address vs. prefix (was: RFC7084) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Gert Doering
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA (was: RFC7084) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Nick Hilliard
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA (was: RFC7084) Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] RFC7084 Ole Troan
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Owen DeLong
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Owen DeLong
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Owen DeLong
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Owen DeLong
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA sthaug
- Re: IA_PD bit in RA Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: IA_PD bit in RA STARK, BARBARA H