IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-02.txt

Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540963A0B15 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 01:23:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSAZflwIBb1x for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 01:23:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [130.37.15.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E383A0B48 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 01:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #157) id m1jA9CY-0000F8C; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:23:26 +0100
Message-Id: <m1jA9CY-0000F8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-02.txt
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <158191113600.5878.10760004246455372944@ietfa.amsl.com> <35f3e826-81ce-d505-3c27-def73983d291@gmail.com> <CAMGpriVTPPcc9bKuKANp1BLnDLU2gmmeq9yfcNFm+sZaNtgoBg@mail.gmail.com> <m1j9lU7-0000JCC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:03:57 +0100 ." <m1j9lU7-0000JCC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 10:23:24 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/hzBaDoqZoEhaB2OWybVIuwpxOYM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:23:58 -0000

>I implemented something similar to the algorithm in Section 4.4, but
>extended that it also detects link changes. For example, if you
>have a VM on laptop then the VM doesn't see a link down event when the
>laptop moves to a new network.
>
>The advantage of Section 4.4 is that it works today. No need to change
>any routers.

I forgot to mention. The current algorithm in Section 4.4 fails if a 
router sends multiple RAs with a different prefix in each RA.
As far as I know, that behavior is allowed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email