Re: Why /64
Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au> Sun, 27 October 2013 20:43 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17C911E82B0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KLzxRW7JNGRA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm23-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C88E11E8178 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm23.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 20:43:46 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.239] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 20:43:46 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1048.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 20:43:46 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 616915.95921.bm@omp1048.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 79051 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2013 20:43:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.au; s=s1024; t=1382906626; bh=F5NykLRECg9hvxgsKIOGjn97mIky4fofv2LupzPJVwA=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uXS/7Y/GCUQP8DhpyefQHnahm43Iqp1r4KjvmBdxmoQV+3m0GoiIFEEZvYzIId5As9IBS+Zy/dp1U+ZgKhXOF0kPHhng+7ve1YbkzR/obfLJXhlIxArjpYm10543Z1rJCo2navgzV+gn+rQSe5W+KLKUa646Qvvlf5vbFoOSv80=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1+Hyu/Q0/M98LGIUBes0MzR2b6z03Hsf7mry5mphzO5KgA2O06FyEu/2YQBg/TYinTRuFi02nm287MFO/46atoY+nQWEmzvJksvQhw0LZXs20tF99rp6FClU9BtzKETZpxlhObIjbphTFyn4GcTPOaYnCrrY6jzQfta56vyYKfA=;
X-YMail-OSG: 7KO7YTsVM1nkdyMhz7i0R0ntYK1.IG4WNDULUjws_e5MNM4 vaLi1BO07KmcIcCX8UjtLr3IiW0Ml7bwL1yNmjxGO1bU5AX4cVU6cnsopwhO r9ze.JIapcRqyXnRAPOyZ0FHfAY9PSoUY18bIXHO.I7qvhW1l4FSjscq.SVb EgupXUNmOy958Rl_MkV6jvuphrB6y.oDi4B8OThcafJHXvtJ7OfQNKor8Ddk 9pcwj68ZyTH63aE3IIRaXFYy0_lR391vSBrDDW5hbYM7MJF87hwdyhyHV.F0 iIxrIYh489SZcmvMirHXTRSsNnxSfdauz5yx2z86UmUUpMCK0oDnyZf24Pwo sWs2s5M_K0ZaWUdYLSOB.kPsoaDJG7pEJM1vwskTNGEkdCX5hu_SNRL0lmD4 nZH0kqirvqlwu9NN5DDtr5bYmQiCB9kQG4OlPHMt.8_R9D0piVcNC27djhlq uLfbsEUrFlnxS5V721z2Yc2kSi13vkJZQJ298nCGu6W5AwB1DrAfdy3vB8z2 IufL4KTLyJj93QpsrJV_5AI_Ml4Fv8kK591ytrBC11Nh5FC0kHhJGqh9B9Ji rnZ.wiNSDYgnaJWNdwE.GsypAghvdsHHFXLxbelMChvsF4pkBpRmaT67r9Yj 4TAUEbpmasQEuTDFghjUuSrCMmNkX82pTPbC9YCETR49dE49aWvzLrn_Lztm AZUhSTz4-
Received: from [150.101.221.237] by web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:45 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, CgoKCjxzbmlwPgo.Cj5TcGVjaWZpY2FsbHksIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhlICJxdWl0ZSBhIGZldyBbSVNQc10gZ2l2ZSBleGFjdGx5IDEgSVB2NiBhZGRyZXNzIHRvIHRoZWlyIHVzZXJzIiBzdGF0ZW1lbnQgaXMgbm90IHRydWUgaW4gdGhlIGNhc2Ugb2YgbWFpbnN0cmVhbSByZXNpZGVudGlhbCBJU1BzIC0gSSB0aGluayB0aGV5IGFsbCBwcm92aWRlIGF0IGxlYXN0IGEgLzY0LCBhbmQgbW9yZSB1c3VhbGx5IGF0IGxlYXN0IGEgLzYwLgo.CgpEdXJpbmcgdGhlaXIgSVB2NiB0cmlhbCwgSW50ZXJub2RlIGdhdmUgb3UBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52695DDE.70909@gont.com.ar> <526AA24F.6010609@gmail.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr0_anudWNpWRkvMGvD_pvyEscnuqEsPUy4YNm3e9Hue9g@mail.gmail.com> <526CE821.1000900@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr138KfSo_g5mr-5r4-H8Fxrk0GUnDLy0nLHZr1z6PC_cg@mail.gmail.com> <526D3AE2.2020300@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1DnHrkXmYhGc-mSg4W94=-=DLizm0iR18hPCa=yw3Pdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1382906625.63973.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:45 -0700
From: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: Why /64
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1DnHrkXmYhGc-mSg4W94=-=DLizm0iR18hPCa=yw3Pdw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:43:52 -0000
<snip> > >Specifically, I think the "quite a few [ISPs] give exactly 1 IPv6 address to their users" statement is not true in the case of mainstream residential ISPs - I think they all provide at least a /64, and more usually at least a /60. > During their IPv6 trial, Internode gave out /60s. When they deployed production residential broadband IPv6 in 2011 (which I worked on), the provided a dynamic /64 to the CPE via SLAAC (which allows direct connection of a PC as an alternative to using a CPE), and a static /56 via DHCPv6-PD. They fairly recently said they now have 10% of their customers using IPv6, as they've been enabling it by default on all new customer connections and providing IPv6 enabled CPE with it. Going by the published customer numbers, 10% is in the order of 16 000 to 18 000 services with native IPv6 connectivity. http://www.internode.on.net/news/2013/06/309.php >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd: New… Fernando Gont
- RE: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Sander Steffann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Tim Chown
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addres… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Tim Chown
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fred Baker (fred)
- Why /64 Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Scott Brim
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Scott Brim
- Re: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Why /64 [was Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 TJ
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fred Baker (fred)
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Bless, Roland (TM)
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Sander Steffann
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: Why /64 Wuyts Carl
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Sander Steffann
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 [was Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 sthaug
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Alissa Cooper
- Tracking and correlation properties of IIDs (was … Alissa Cooper
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Hosnieh
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Nabil Benamar
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses (Fwd:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Scott Brim
- Re: Why /64 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Fernando Gont
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Erik Kline
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Why /64 Templin, Fred L
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Jeroen Massar
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- RE: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Mark Andrews
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- Re: Why /64 Ralph Droms
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: Why /64 Brian Haberman
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Why /64 Peter Dordal
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Re: Why /64 Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Re: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Why /64 Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: Why /64 Karl Auer
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Why /64 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why /64 Erik Nordmark
- Re: Why /64 神明達哉
- Re: Why /64 Ray Hunter
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [6MAN] Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addr… Warren Kumari
- Re: Deprecating EUI-64 Based IPv6 Addresses Jahangir Hossain