Re: Why one Internet?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DDF11E80CF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtDObRCJ+l0t for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE4011E80B5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrq13 with SMTP id rq13so68034pbb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=soVPm9bwRkuLeA72nRp0y3xwGXmwVuXwIA0+ErUFbZY=; b=iTNwK/dbgDkUSuIsXy3/gBMjAYKXCMO8uqUwCyw2+scaL7ZlGnC2ScOsd3gvdv4evV kCjMplDVKVA2UUiVcrHP5a/rxMKfA2eFq7LZESRBngDL7sotpqn8sp8hL8bqC2khTIrf OdEiF78+8w0JixHstCDs7xtkyujzQqtwAr8J/wbt5xIM9HTmykFd23ivJ1jqlgcTjQWq rA/Ebu6k4DUVNv0f2eiesD0HJ/CgVaSjimDsoy4AJ5M6H5qnvDioIgVn72fG/fNDZnJt 1NrP6YteEGkHg57vOcUYDpcQ0iMXHDKlf4nIOmNcWvLOTbk0xGftwU+Qpj+HrCV4kS+8 CPWw==
Received: by 10.68.200.225 with SMTP id jv1mr8450130pbc.120.1334070080936; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.27] (c-69-181-250-158.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.250.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm104964pba.2.2012.04.10.08.01.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACQuieZ6gqO_aTeRxB+GOM2RccCTtXfksCf=Kc=+m7O0RLEVYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:01:18 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4B73C6B1-35AF-49BF-BA0F-2D663D0EDD1B@gmail.com>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <2A473079-6CF0-49B9-93CD-F0BA27500CEF@cs.ucla.edu> <CACQuieZ6gqO_aTeRxB+GOM2RccCTtXfksCf=Kc=+m7O0RLEVYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org Mailing List" <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:01:22 -0000

Pars,

This discussion is out of scope for the ipv6@ietf.org mailing list.  Please take it elsewhere.

Bob & Ole
6man w.g. Chairs



On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Pars Mutaf wrote:

> I am here to question: 
> 
> My question is why IPv6 is the end of the road. 
> 
> We shouldn't give all the responsibility to a few persons.
> We should not be dependent on their decisions. 
> 
> If the transition to a complete IPv6 network is not possible, then we can add a new Internet. It can be IPv4, IPv6, or even IPv7. 
> 
> Pars
> 
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> the Internet is a means to communicate.
> and the market drives for most effective/efficient/economical communication systems (there are tradeoffs between the adjectives)
> wonder if you could help explain how your picture of "network of Internets" would be more effective and economical (than what we have now)
> 
> Lixia
> 
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Pars Mutaf wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then another one etc. 
>> 
>> We can have as many Internets as we need, all different. 
>> 
>> We just need a *network of Internets*. 
>> 
>> The first (current) Internet is an IPv4 Internet.
>> The second Internet can be an IPv4 Internet too. In this case we would have 2 IPv4 Internets. 
>> Obviously, in this case, we would have the same addresses used by two different nodes in 
>> the two Internets. I think it is possible to locate the node we need. I am not here to discuss 
>> these details. 
>> 
>> The second Internet can be an IPv6 Internet. 
>> 
>> The second Internet can be a IPv7 Internet. 
>> 
>> The second Internet can be IPv6 but we may have a third one which is IPv7 etc. 
>> 
>> We just need a network of Internets, all possibly different. 
>> 
>> Pars
>> http://content-based-science.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------