Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7D721F8683 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.607
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.566, BAYES_05=-1.11, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFa4xIjIOAAY for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15D21F8674 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail210-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.237) by CH1EHSOBE017.bigfish.com (10.43.70.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:44 +0000
Received: from mail210-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail210-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3014C4087F; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -31
X-BigFish: PS-31(zz9371I542M1432N98dKzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24h304l)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT011.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail210-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail210-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1336671761398595_14697; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.230]) by mail210-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7EB240054; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT011.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by CH1EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (10.43.70.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:39 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.48.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.74.2; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:30 +0000
Message-ID: <005201cd2ecb$97d6fbe0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <4F9CF3A8.7000801@gmail.com> <4FA92EA3.1040802@gmail.com> <20120508173453.GA59571@elstar.local>
Subject: Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:39:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.244.213]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:42:45 -0000

---- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:34 PM
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > I'm not exactly seeing overwhelming consensus, but the loudest
> > virtual hum was for
> > 
> >    http://[fe80::a-en1]
> > 
> > Advantage: allows use of browser.
> > Disadvantage: doesn't allow simple cut and paste.
> > 
> > There was a suggestion to encourage a fix to ping (and traceroute?) to
> > allow the "-" separator, and we must note that in any case, strange
> > characters in the interface ID will always have to be %-encoded.
> 
> I am concerned that the long-term result of this might be that we will
> have to live with both % and - used as separators in various tools and
> interfaces and that this might at the end even cause changes to other
> tools and specifications that currently are just fine with using % as
> a separator. Perhaps I am overly anxious but only future will tell.

Yes, over the long term I could well see the use of % fading away,
but I would regard that as a good thing:-)

Tom Petch

> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>