Re: Extending a /64

otroan@employees.org Wed, 11 November 2020 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EA23A1047 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:16:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xrs0l6Q5_728 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37133A1045 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [IPv6:2a01:79c:cebd:9724:90b2:fb60:ab39:3516]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC3654E11AFD; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D484943D48A0; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:16:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: Extending a /64
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaDYrXVTGQeWh4aAc-qUVCoxRNokwANpQhuZ4OGdpySMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:16:52 +0100
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5532F1B1-5495-4CF6-A516-AB29481E160A@employees.org>
References: <005ECBB3-088B-4363-BB53-8D4AD25CA3D2@employees.org> <b468124f-f85b-7e20-a354-c6b7eaba3447@mccallumwhyman.com> <20593.1604972743@localhost> <CAKr6gn0tedRz4iBu49Lrw5qMCdXWPcg-66UAOfHeJ_ZUeq8U4g@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2c_qaQGY2J62LDh=EZYHo5poYNF_Asf908ofR3wfmW1g@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3wgdOUKqOyqJ4bTvVv4PKq81anYCxASOTCEMg3T84zig@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaDYrXVTGQeWh4aAc-qUVCoxRNokwANpQhuZ4OGdpySMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/iUDeeRjXJen8LYN9BSj5sfo6ssQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:16:59 -0000


> On 11 Nov 2020, at 20:44, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> it seems that this whole conversation is really:
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-05
> 
> happening again.
> 
> right? :) "I'd like to use all the bits in my address as I see fit for my purposes"

Possibly but you replied to the wrong thread.
This thread is about how exploring the solution space for how to extend a network allocated only a /64, without changing the 64 bit boundary.

You are not the only one hijacking threads, so don't feel bad. ;-)

Ole.