IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69709129866 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AHMqb1WZ1e4Q for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57681129864 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t8so20192390vke.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hT/Uu91XPjw7ER0NBpQW7B5T5JYcQMdD5aXKEgirHxI=; b=UBTqc8VDiWC9CuUeTwvA8/0Zb3LnmNyXnsDFJFTaBO5lVqNvxshtuH1K8lSQ/jiKnR hnogcjcjps5gEH4AtUl5WGeuIcKZqAsEjMs5cj/nhXL1vU/d2Wl9WSk4CVPqJP72FF9l zeGByw/P69ZGA8j5kU50sxPcca4B4f5KfvfqWbxVbaBuNPTEdWH9HGKGGNdH14Qm3I1X wJV/CxhAyd89WfTm0VY1W1DA4PIawmsEo1qZJvEL8CNTKLFfNxOeeXr9nDg55G9NxaVV azqNLNTtfWDsxGdSOBkfjyxUCKRqfjWMUGy3+QbHIuv0si4CfmHmeSCJ2BRtsyVYXRIZ xOGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hT/Uu91XPjw7ER0NBpQW7B5T5JYcQMdD5aXKEgirHxI=; b=DsBqfEvCxxl3umZyK0WBhNU/h2vfRPRJwiGyP1cg+G+S2rkDjfcpGwtxCf8iyKZrNr PaSfM+2mGaEzlxDfGzjp3VdgME6rjK6laOzu121x7Y6C7hxI88xznTXR8zbT58k0TINV VuIEyUKxdOaAfn4lpmnNhfGOn7p6exA56f/kr803odGOhUm4gOjB0p+1B3giVW8JPlHS wr+6QdcBxYzH5X6Ji8Y1ZpbhJE+ufeuP7gQxEKRt8wSpQ1bO/OEtqJpmst2NVrdzlbvs DF6Y/aboem2km7Mi9SGVVkXLEdU7H/pYkv82khanmlbaFnx23PYqdfhM3as1sz3Qks91 AO9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n+jGQsMpwFh233OXCOQ/eYmKhCE3w8zvF0ITdQIfD1f5dr50n9e8UFYiPSx2rWmLmGk8j2L+4T48DGtzzf
X-Received: by 10.31.163.199 with SMTP id m190mr215825vke.10.1487858801179; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:06:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170223134733.GL89584@hanna.meerval.net>
References: <CAL9jLaZgTp++PJ9KGHEWuPoVm6t3b8QfVDCEhz5h4fv-0fuUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3SbR=xt3RPu7+q1o14wKuUuwUc6oG+BgZtEK1O+m5sWw@mail.gmail.com> <4936e96b-fc82-4de0-9188-ced9547deb2f@Spark> <CAKD1Yr3K+SJb_4ksZ96yNypVKJE-fXopuVaXNhhKp1gkh1=QEg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222144147.GC89584@hanna.meerval.net> <CAKD1Yr2n=ogFo7LJYgjcraoFxioQQzmo8HYxzNRJ10VA8xMVOg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222153129.GE89584@hanna.meerval.net> <CAKD1Yr2-yS-tX9Pe0Rk_74hnXa9Rc-yTHV0m=Kbi2q0wvYGgPg@mail.gmail.com> <20170223113705.GJ89584@hanna.meerval.net> <CAKD1Yr2_9vhdGDBVTkpRcBUXBOKqw5nETp40Xc=r1rh3gj4PuA@mail.gmail.com> <20170223134733.GL89584@hanna.meerval.net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:06:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2+j_mGdDJ6xpSz=WyNuFuucfwX3K8=YwDHbam2=jMHtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114150dc526ea60549331f81
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jAOiAh5-Asuu5oQHW98JXIw7LC4>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:06:44 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>; wrote:

> And how to protect the interconnection between the first-hop router and
> the edge-of-your-network? or the edge of the network itself? I suspect
> this idea is still in a theoretical stage.
>

Not sure what you mean. If you have an edge ACL and you want to ensure that
packets in the machine /64 but not in the arbitrarily small subnet you've
decided to restrict the machines to, just allow the /120 at the edge and
drop the /64. If you're talking about protecting the interconnects between
routers, you can just use /127.


> Can you point me to a RIPE, NANOG or APRICOT talk where this idea is
> shared in its entirety?
>

You don't need a RIPE talk to do some experimentation, do you? If it works
well, you give the talk. :-)

v2.1.2.p1 | Report a Bug | By Email